2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social evolution under demographic stochasticity

Abstract: How social traits such as altruism and spite evolve remains an open question in evolutionary biology. One factor thought to be potentially important is demographic stochasticity. Here we provide a general theoretical analysis of the role of demographic stochasticity in social evolution. We show that the evolutionary impact of stochasticity depends on how the social action alters the recipient’s life cycle. If the action alters the recipient’s death rate, then demographic stochasticity always favours altruism a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We wish to use to understand how selection, stochasticity, and epidemiology interact to shape the evolution of sterility virulence. To do so, we adopt the approach we used elsewhere (McLeod and Day ), and ask what is the likelihood of observing the stochastic process in a particular state? If we are more likely to observe the process in a state in which strain i is most frequent, then we will say strain i is favored.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wish to use to understand how selection, stochasticity, and epidemiology interact to shape the evolution of sterility virulence. To do so, we adopt the approach we used elsewhere (McLeod and Day ), and ask what is the likelihood of observing the stochastic process in a particular state? If we are more likely to observe the process in a state in which strain i is most frequent, then we will say strain i is favored.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is particularly valuable when examining population forecasts of species to climate extremes (Thibault and Brown 2008), and selection for optimal life history strategies for a given environment (Tuljapurkar et al 2009). As such, we argue that our second derivative approach is particularly valuable for active research in human demography ( e.g ., McLeod and Day (2019)), population ecology ( e.g ., Feng et al (2022)), and comparative biology ( e.g ., Compagnoni et al (2021)). We emphasize the applicability of second-order perturbation theory, such as Kato’s theory (Kato 2013), in describing the nonlinear response in structured populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, an individual’s relative fitness ( Ω i ) is a distribution with the expected value, variance, and higher moments all contributing to evolution. (Eq 15 –see Methods) [7,37,57]. Consider, for purposes of illustration, a case in which the relative and absolute fitness variation of cooperators is completely independent of the fitness variation of non-cooperators so that , and the variances of each are equal ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could easily expand the right side of Eq 15 to higher central moments ( k = 2, 3 etc.). All else held equal, the k = 2 term () will be negative and potentially beneficial to the evolution of cooperation if it were a large, positive probability covariance [37,57]. The k = 3 term () will be positive, potentially boosting cooperation if a highly negative covariance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%