2019
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is sterility virulence most common in sexually transmitted infections? Examining the role of epidemiology

Abstract: Sterility virulence, or the reduction in host fecundity due to infection, occurs in many host–pathogen systems. Notably, sterility virulence is more common for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) than for directly transmitted pathogens, while other forms of virulence tend to be limited in STIs. This has led to the suggestion that sterility virulence may have an adaptive explanation. By focusing upon finite population models, we show that the observed patterns of sterility virulence can be explained by consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fixation probability, mean extinction time, and stationary distribution are accessible by the same means as for the continuum limit. Applications of diffusion approximations are abundant and cover diverse topics (e.g., Assaf & Mobilia, 2011;Constable et al, 2016;Czuppon & Gokhale, 2018;Czuppon & Traulsen, 2018;Débarre & Otto, 2016;Houchmandzadeh, 2015;Kang & Park, 2017;Koopmann et al, 2017;McLeod & Day, 2019;Parsons et al, 2018;Reichenbach et al, 2007;Schenk et al, 2020;Serrao & Täuber, 2017;Traulsen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fixation probability, mean extinction time, and stationary distribution are accessible by the same means as for the continuum limit. Applications of diffusion approximations are abundant and cover diverse topics (e.g., Assaf & Mobilia, 2011;Constable et al, 2016;Czuppon & Gokhale, 2018;Czuppon & Traulsen, 2018;Débarre & Otto, 2016;Houchmandzadeh, 2015;Kang & Park, 2017;Koopmann et al, 2017;McLeod & Day, 2019;Parsons et al, 2018;Reichenbach et al, 2007;Schenk et al, 2020;Serrao & Täuber, 2017;Traulsen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of these finite population size approximations are abundant and cover diverse topics (e.g. Reichenbach et al, 2007;Assaf and Mobilia, 2011;Houchmandzadeh, 2015;Constable et al, 2016;Débarre and Otto, 2016;Kang and Park, 2017;Koopmann et al, 2017;Serrao and Täuber, 2017;Czuppon and Gokhale, 2018;Czuppon and Traulsen, 2018;Parsons et al, 2018;McLeod and Day, 2019;Schenk et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a systematic derivation provides relations between ecological quantities such as the expected population growth rate and the variance in population growth rate and connects them to evolutionary forces such as natural selection and genetic drift in trait frequency space. Using these equations, we synthesize the connections between noise-induced effects on population dynamics, including the ‘Gillespie effect’ of bet-hedging theory (Gillespie, 1977), ‘noise-induced effects’ in ecological population models (Constable et al, 2016; Parsons et al, 2018), ‘drift-induced selection’ (Veller et al, 2017; Saunders et al, 2018), ‘noise-induced selection’ (Week et al, 2021), and long-term effects of demographic stochasticity through the effects of ‘evolutionary noise’ (McLeod and Day, 2019a; McLeod and Day, 2019b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%