Social Engagement Network and Corporate Social Entrepreneurship in Sido Muncul Company, Indonesia

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the social engagement network in Sido Muncul's CSR, the partnership program with farmers, and how the implementation of corporate social entrepreneurship in the program is carried out. The research design uses qualitative methods with a grounded theory approach that tests the validity and reliability of the data using triangulation of data sources and methods, namely, data obtained through documentation and the results of surveys and interviews to more than one observation unit. Data was obtained from surveys and interviews with Sido Muncul's Public Relations and CSR Division, as well as partner farmers. The results of this study indicate that the social engagement network in Sido Muncul's partnership program is related to the role of farmer groups, farmer cooperatives, government, NGOs, universities, and private companies as facilitators and control functions, thus creating mutually beneficial relationships with one another. The process of implementing corporate social entrepreneurship in Sido Muncul's CSR for the partnership program with farmers consists of nine stages: problem identification, coordination with related parties, allocation of resources and commitments, collaboration with NGOs, local entrepreneurs and government, social innovation and the creation of new businesses, documentation of activities, reporting, monitoring and evaluation, as well as publications.

Empreendedorismo Social em contexto Public - Descrição Bibliométrica com suporte em 76 anos de Investigações Indexadas na Web of Science

“…Fonte: Ilustração extraída como output do software VOSviewer (2021) A Figura 2 apresenta a rede de citações entre textos da base de dados. Como resultado, observa-se 4 agrupamentos, na seguinte organização: cluster 1, reúne os documentos Agafonow (2014), Bacq (2011) e Fowler (2000; o cluster 2, relaciona ostrabalhos de Baron (2007), Hoogendoorn (2016) e Short (2009); o cluster 3, agrupa Bacq (2018) e e o quarto cluster une Cook (2003) e Karosec (2006).…”

“…Fonte: Ilustração extraída como output do software VOSviewer (2021) Com base na Figura 3, os 3 clusters, estão representados na sequência: em vermelho, são evidenciadas conexões por uso das mesmas referências entre os artigos de Korosec (2006) (119 citações, 3 links), (157 citações, 3 links) e Pache (2012) (93 citações, 0 link); em azul conexão entre Short (2009) Por fim, optou-se analisar os artigos publicados no ano corrente, no caso 2021, para descrever temas recentes de investigação sobre empreendedorismo social (Tabela 2). que aborda as múltiplas faces do empreendedorismo social por concepções situadas em duas escolas, a de Inovação Social e a de Empreendedorismo Social.…”

Cooperation and Environmental Responsibility as Positive Factors for Entrepreneurial Resilience

“…Sometimes, the environment in which these communities live become polluted, and they suffer socio-economic distress [25][26][27]. In contrast, some projects offer an alternative entrepreneurial model based not only on economics, but also on innovative strategies and social aspects of the area in which they operate [28][29][30][31], also involving some integrated models of the stakeholder theory [32]. An entrepreneurial organization cannot consider itself to be an isolated institution, considering that it has a precise community context, even if it operates across different regions [33].…”

Is Corporate Social Entrepreneurship a (So Far) Missed Opportunity for Higher Education Institutions? Evidence from Germany

“…Although the controversy about the role of corporations in the globalized world is not a new phenomenon, the debate has gained momentum not least due to contributions by Porter and Kramer [5] (p. 77), who postulated that the "next evolution in the capitalism model recognizes new and better ways to develop products, serve markets, and build productive enterprises." It seems that the urgent need for transformation of entire economies and societies favors the preoccupation with the new concept, which is conspicuously often associated with emergent market economies, low-income markets, and approaches to fighting extreme poverty [6][7][8][9][10]. Moreover, the understanding of CSE continues to be left to a broad spectrum of interpretations and requires a sharpening of its content in order to assert itself in the field of highly established but often also ambiguous terms such as corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship.…”

“…The question of how far CSE will develop into an independent sub-discipline in entrepreneurship research is still open today. Beyond entrepreneurship research in the narrow sense, CSE is regularly linked to stakeholder theory and networking [6,18], the base of the pyramid approach [19], and especially corporate social responsibility, which CSE aims to reform or further develop [11,20,21].…”