Social dignity for marginalized people in public healthcare: an interpretive review and building blocks for a non-ideal theory

Schmidt, Jante; Trappenburg, Margo; Tonkens, Evelien

doi:10.1007/s11019-020-09987-8

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 55 publications

(42 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Continuous research is necessary to understand ways to maintain dignity by identifying factors that are barriers to the goal of enhancing dignity. Dignity is also part of social life and "social dignity is usually understood in terms of countering its violation" [7]. The most vulnerable members of society may encounter existential inequalities, such as unequal distribution of autonomy and respect, limitations of freedom and communication with relatives, unequal distribution of resources, inequalities in income, and unequal distribution of health care access [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dignity Violations and Barriers to Dignity Assurance for Terminally Ill Patients at the End of Life: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: Investigation into forms of behavior that violate dignity is not the typical way to look for means of dignity preservation, but it may be the optimal way to prevent improper behavior. Numerous studies document that maintaining and improving patient dignity at the end of life require an understanding of factors posing threats to dignity in health care organizations. This study aimed to assess associations between dignity-violating behaviors and barriers to the assurance of dignity in health care settings from the perspective of health professionals. Materials and Methods: An anonymous survey of health professionals was conducted in Lithuania in May 2021 by using a convenience sampling method (N = 168). Two scales were developed and included in the questionnaire. One scale measured respondents’ perceptions of Dignity Violations that they had witnessed. The other scale measured their opinions about Barriers to Dignity Assurance of terminally ill patients in clinical settings. Data analysis began with descriptive statistics, followed by exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the underlying structure of each scale. The variables assigned to distinct components in the PCA were combined into reflective latent variables in a path model. The path model of the relationships between the latent constructs was tested for significant links by implementing the partial least squares structural equation modeling technique. Results: Dehumanization, Humiliation, Inattentiveness, Control, Demonization, and Manipulation were identified as major forms of dignity-violating behavior. In addition, Organizational Barriers and Patient as an Obstacle were identified as two major types of barriers to the assurance of patient dignity. Both organizational and patient-oriented barriers were directly or indirectly associated with all forms of violations of patient dignity. Conclusions: The Dignity Violations scale showed potential for estimating professionals’ observations of dignity violations in health care settings. Perceived high workloads, staff shortages, insufficient resources, and lack of organizational support were identified as negative organizational factors that may result in increased risk of seeing patients as obstacles to providing care that preserves the dignity of terminally ill patients.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%