Dignity Violations and Barriers to Dignity Assurance for Terminally Ill Patients at the End of Life: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Investigation into forms of behavior that violate dignity is not the typical way to look for means of dignity preservation, but it may be the optimal way to prevent improper behavior. Numerous studies document that maintaining and improving patient dignity at the end of life require an understanding of factors posing threats to dignity in health care organizations. This study aimed to assess associations between dignity-violating behaviors and barriers to the assurance of dignity in health care settings from the perspective of health professionals. Materials and Methods: An anonymous survey of health professionals was conducted in Lithuania in May 2021 by using a convenience sampling method (N = 168). Two scales were developed and included in the questionnaire. One scale measured respondents’ perceptions of Dignity Violations that they had witnessed. The other scale measured their opinions about Barriers to Dignity Assurance of terminally ill patients in clinical settings. Data analysis began with descriptive statistics, followed by exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the underlying structure of each scale. The variables assigned to distinct components in the PCA were combined into reflective latent variables in a path model. The path model of the relationships between the latent constructs was tested for significant links by implementing the partial least squares structural equation modeling technique. Results: Dehumanization, Humiliation, Inattentiveness, Control, Demonization, and Manipulation were identified as major forms of dignity-violating behavior. In addition, Organizational Barriers and Patient as an Obstacle were identified as two major types of barriers to the assurance of patient dignity. Both organizational and patient-oriented barriers were directly or indirectly associated with all forms of violations of patient dignity. Conclusions: The Dignity Violations scale showed potential for estimating professionals’ observations of dignity violations in health care settings. Perceived high workloads, staff shortages, insufficient resources, and lack of organizational support were identified as negative organizational factors that may result in increased risk of seeing patients as obstacles to providing care that preserves the dignity of terminally ill patients.

Dignity promotion in people with advanced chronic diseases: contributions for a value-based healthcare practice

“…Illness trajectory, power imbalance, a loss of privacy, and being treated or hospitalized can all have an impact on human dignity. Human dignity violations can harm patients' bodies, spirits, morality, and spirituality, exposing them to stress and anguish ( 9 ). As we become older, we want to know that we will be loved and respected, that the person taking care of us is compassionate and understands that we are unique individuals with important lives.…”

Dignity in Action in the Home Hospice: The Narrative Selection of a Multidisciplinary Staff

“…Social relations and communication stood out among nurses providing home palliative care, who identified their experience of compassion—a major component of EOL dignity—with positive caring interactions (Devik et al, 2020). Conversely, palliative care staff identified dehumanization, humiliation, inattentiveness, control, demonization, and manipulation as dignity-violating behaviors (Peičius et al, 2022).…”

Factors influence the dignity of burns patients: A cross-sectional study

“…Previous studies have focused on the psychological negative effects of burns on patients; 5,17 however, far less focus has been placed on the intrinsic dignity of burns patients. Moreover, quantitative studies of dignity loss have focused on patients with cancer or advanced disease [18][19][20] and have not considered cross-sectional investigations and the analyses of factors that can influence dignity in burns patients, the dignity of burns patients is often overlooked. Therefore, it is vital that researchers investigate the dignity of burns patients to clarify the presence and extent of loss.…”