2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4590-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social context has differential effects on acquisition of nicotine self-administration in male and female rats

Abstract: Rational Smoking typically begins during adolescence or early adulthood in a social context, yet the role of social context in animal models is poorly understood. Objectives The present study examined the effect of social context on acquisition of nicotine self-administration. Methods Sixty day-old male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to press a lever for nicotine (0.015 mg/kg, IV) or saline infusions (males only) on a fixed-ratio (FR1) schedule of reinforcement across 9 sessions in duplex cham… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use only of male mice is a limitation of this study since several reports show evidences for sex differences in the central effects of nicotine in rodent models Peartree et al, 2017). Although social factors are crucial in smoking dependence in humans, differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of nicotine or the effect of gonadal hormones may underlie some of the sex differences observed (Pogun and Yararbas, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use only of male mice is a limitation of this study since several reports show evidences for sex differences in the central effects of nicotine in rodent models Peartree et al, 2017). Although social factors are crucial in smoking dependence in humans, differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of nicotine or the effect of gonadal hormones may underlie some of the sex differences observed (Pogun and Yararbas, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also studies that report no sex differences in nicotine IVSA [18,31,44,55,56]. These conflicting findings may be due to methodological differences that influence the magnitude of sex differences, such as the presence of cues [6] or differences in social context [40]. The absence of sex differences in some studies may also be due to small sample sizes that reduce statistical power, thereby decreasing the likelihood of detecting sex differences in IVSA when such differences exist in the population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most experiments have been conducted on adult males but increasing studies are comparing the influence of sex or development stages. Social isolation initially reduces self-administration of nicotine in males, but enhances nicotine intake during later sessions especially in females (Peartree et al, 2017). Adolescent Sprague-Dawley rats female rats consumed more sweetener-supplemented alcohol in isolation than when group-housed while in the same studies adolescent and adult male consume more alcohol in triads versus when isolate-housed (Varlinskaya et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Lack Of Social Interactions or Negative Social Interactimentioning
confidence: 80%