1992
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social comparison in everyday life.

Abstract: Ninety-four college students recorded details of their social comparisons over 2 weeks using a new instrument, the Rochester Social Comparison Record. Major results were (a) comparison direction varied with relationship with the target; (b) precomparison negative mood led more often to upward comparison than to downward comparison, supporting a selective affect-cognition priming model in which dysphoria primes negative thoughts about the self (Bower, 1991;Forgas, Bower, & Moylan, 1990) rather than a motivation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

31
481
9
11

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 573 publications
(532 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
31
481
9
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Pese a esto, algunos estudios han referido posibles consecuencias en la esfera afectiva y en el bienestar psicológico derivado de las posibles formas de compararnos con otros (Buunk, Collins, Dakof, Taylor & VanYperen, 1990;Buunk, Gibbons, Belmonte, Peiró & Zurriaga, 2005;Buunk, Ybema, Gibbons & Ipenburg, 2001;Michinov, 2007). En este sentido, aquellos que tienden a compararse hacia arriba presentan mayores efectos negativos en sus afectos (Buunk, 2006;Buunk, Peiró, Rodríguez & Bravo, 2006), en tanto aquellos que se comparan hacia abajo, podrían generar mayor efecto positivo, especialmente cuando la persona que se compara está sometida a estrés o morbilidad (Buunk, 2006;Buunk & Ybema, 1997;Friedswijk, Buunk, Steverink & Slaets, 2004;Gibbons & alfonso urzúa m. & alEjandra caQuEo-urízar Buunk, 1999;Gibbons, Gerrard, Lando & McGovern 1991;Taylor, Wood & Lichtman, 1985; Van der Zee, Buunk & Sanderman, 1998;Van Yperen, Brenninkmeijer & Buunk, 2006;Wheeler & Miyake, 1992).…”
Section: D) CV = (Condiciones De Vida + Satisfacción Con La Vida) * Vunclassified
“…Pese a esto, algunos estudios han referido posibles consecuencias en la esfera afectiva y en el bienestar psicológico derivado de las posibles formas de compararnos con otros (Buunk, Collins, Dakof, Taylor & VanYperen, 1990;Buunk, Gibbons, Belmonte, Peiró & Zurriaga, 2005;Buunk, Ybema, Gibbons & Ipenburg, 2001;Michinov, 2007). En este sentido, aquellos que tienden a compararse hacia arriba presentan mayores efectos negativos en sus afectos (Buunk, 2006;Buunk, Peiró, Rodríguez & Bravo, 2006), en tanto aquellos que se comparan hacia abajo, podrían generar mayor efecto positivo, especialmente cuando la persona que se compara está sometida a estrés o morbilidad (Buunk, 2006;Buunk & Ybema, 1997;Friedswijk, Buunk, Steverink & Slaets, 2004;Gibbons & alfonso urzúa m. & alEjandra caQuEo-urízar Buunk, 1999;Gibbons, Gerrard, Lando & McGovern 1991;Taylor, Wood & Lichtman, 1985; Van der Zee, Buunk & Sanderman, 1998;Van Yperen, Brenninkmeijer & Buunk, 2006;Wheeler & Miyake, 1992).…”
Section: D) CV = (Condiciones De Vida + Satisfacción Con La Vida) * Vunclassified
“…An individual has little control over the amount of asset information received during any given exchange (Sharkey & Singelis, 1995). Comparisons made under these circumstances are less deliberate and are more likely to have a negative impact (Wheeler & Miyake, 1992).…”
Section: Social Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social comparison theories argue that humans tend to assess their own social standing, attributes, skills and other self-defining elements relative to others about whom they have access to information (Wheeler & Miyake, 1992). These points of access may be workrelated (Fischer, Kastenmuller, Frey, & Peus, 2009), personal or romantic (Brewer & Weber, 1994;Salovey & Rodin, 1984), or mediated (Wilcox & Laird, 2000).…”
Section: Social Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The psychological benefits of downward comparisons are supported by research showing this strategy to be more beneficial for overall adjustment and mood than upward or horizontal comparisons (Locke, 2003), with individuals often engaging in downward comparisons when they feel threatened or perceive a lack of personal control (Stewart, Chipperfield, Ruthig, & Heckhausen, 2013;Pyszcynski, Greenberg, & Laprelle, 1985;Wheeler & Miyake, 1992;Wills, 1981). Although some studies suggest downward comparisons can negatively affect selfevaluations and emotions under stressful circumstances (Buunk, Collins, Taylor, VanYperen, & Dakof, 1990;Kemmelmeier & Oyserman, 2001), other findings show downward comparisons to help maintain positive self-perceptions and emotional well-being (Bailis & Chipperfield, 2006;Lockwood, Dolderman, Sadler, & Gerchak, 2004), particularly in lowcontrol circumstances (e.g., older adulthood; Bailis et al, 2005;Heckhausen & Schulz, 1995).…”
Section: Downward Social Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 83%