2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0028756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor.

Abstract: Social class is shaped by an individual's material resources as well as perceptions of rank vis-à-vis others in society, and in this article, we examine how class influences behavior. Diminished resources and lower rank create contexts that constrain social outcomes for lower-class individuals and enhance contextualist tendencies--that is, a focus on external, uncontrollable social forces and other individuals who influence one's life outcomes. In contrast, abundant resources and elevated rank create contexts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
1,052
4
29

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 972 publications
(1,224 citation statements)
references
References 245 publications
50
1,052
4
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Several scholars have theorized that individualism-related changes are explained by socioeconomic development, which involves a shift from agricultural to industrial and post-industrial economies, greater occupational prestige and education, and higher income (e.g., Inglehart & Baker, 2000;Kağıtçıbaşı, 2007;Kraus, Piff, Mendoza-Denton, Rheinschmidt, & Keltner, 2012;Newson & Richerson, 2009;Triandis, 1995;Varnum et al, 2010). Living in an economically developed society reduces the need to rely on a group for survival, allowing people to prioritize individual goals and personal freedom (Inglehart & Baker, 2000).…”
Section: Changes In Ecology and Changes In Icmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several scholars have theorized that individualism-related changes are explained by socioeconomic development, which involves a shift from agricultural to industrial and post-industrial economies, greater occupational prestige and education, and higher income (e.g., Inglehart & Baker, 2000;Kağıtçıbaşı, 2007;Kraus, Piff, Mendoza-Denton, Rheinschmidt, & Keltner, 2012;Newson & Richerson, 2009;Triandis, 1995;Varnum et al, 2010). Living in an economically developed society reduces the need to rely on a group for survival, allowing people to prioritize individual goals and personal freedom (Inglehart & Baker, 2000).…”
Section: Changes In Ecology and Changes In Icmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined markers of socioeconomic development that should be associated with differences in individualism: shifts from agriculture to a service economy, occupational prestige, educational attainment, income, urbanization (Greenfield, 2009;Grossmann & Varnum, 2015;Inglehart & Baker, 2000;Kraus et al, 2012).…”
Section: Socio-ecological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C'est l'influence de ces contextes et des ressources auxquelles ils donnent accès qui caractérisent cette nouvelle littérature. Dans une première partie, nous développer-ons trois approches qui mettent respectivement l'accent sur la disponibilité des ressources matérielles (ressources économiques, , la perception subjective du rang social (ressources symboliques, Kraus, Piff, Mendoza-Denton, Rheinschmidt, & Keltner, 2012), et la valeur accordée aux différentes pratiques culturelles (ressources culturelles, . Sans prétendre à l'exhaustivité, nous présenterons des recherches qui s'inscrivent dans ces trois approches.…”
unclassified
“…For example, when people become wealthier, they feel that they are entitled to have yet more wealth, and their behavior changes accordingly. Kraus et al (2012) which in turn strengthens the weight accorded to relative income in these individuals' utility function. As the value of further advances increases, the desire for such advances strengthens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%