2006
DOI: 10.1386/pjss.5.1.65/1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital in contemporary Europe: evidence from the European Social Survey

Abstract: General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research-You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the research findings that social capital is a multifaceted phenomenon, and that the different dimensions of social capital do not manifest a uniform relationship with the same phenomena (Guillen et al, 2011;Halman & Luijkx, 2006;Kaasa, 2009;Saxton & Benson, 2005), it is possible that the relationship between individualism-collectivism and participation in civic society, for instance, is different to the associations revealed by the present study. Unfortunately, the data from the ESS Round 6 (2012) do not allow us to estimate the strength and the scope of formal social networks.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the research findings that social capital is a multifaceted phenomenon, and that the different dimensions of social capital do not manifest a uniform relationship with the same phenomena (Guillen et al, 2011;Halman & Luijkx, 2006;Kaasa, 2009;Saxton & Benson, 2005), it is possible that the relationship between individualism-collectivism and participation in civic society, for instance, is different to the associations revealed by the present study. Unfortunately, the data from the ESS Round 6 (2012) do not allow us to estimate the strength and the scope of formal social networks.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Moreover, social capital appears to be a multifaceted phenomenon that cannot be captured by any one single measure (Halman & Luijkx, 2006). However, it may even be more complex than this -social capital has been shown to have different dimensions that do not manifest a uniform effect on the same phenomena, be they innovation (Kaasa, 2009) or nonprofit sector growth (Saxton & Benson, 2005), for example.…”
Section: Operationalizing and Measuring Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not expect such a pattern for Muslim-Bulgarians as their ethnic identity is Bulgarian, like the mainstream Bulgarians. Second, based on previous studies reporting on religious identity salience for Muslim minority groups (Verkuyten & Yildiz, 2009), we expect Turkish-Bulgarian and Muslim-Bulgarian youth to more strongly endorse their religious identity than their Bulgarian peers, among whom a generally less pronounced religiousness is observed (Halman & Petterson, 2001) (Hypothesis 1d).…”
Section: Aims Context and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…more individualistic, emphasizing the importance of independence, personal time, personal accomplishments, and freedom to choose one's own goals (Allik & Realo, 2004; see also Halman & Luijkx, 2006;Kemmelmeier, Jambor, & Letner, 2006). The present study goes a step further by examining the relationship between social capital and individualism/ collectivism using a measure that distinguishes between different types of collectivism: familism (e.g., Hui & Triandis, 1986;Realo, Allik, & Vadi, 1997) and institutional collectivism (House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, & Gupta, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%