2019
DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2019.1590138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital and innovativeness of social enterprises: opportunity-motivation-ability and knowledge creation as mediators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We posit that it is pertinent for organizations to consciously design and implement an explicit set of KHRM practices from the SCT perspective (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998) to develop and strengthen innovation performance (Donate et al, 2016). Therefore, a firm's HRM practices should select employees based on their potential than current knowledge, skills, and experience (Lepak and Snell, 2002) for them to participate in learning unique knowledge necessary for the social capital of the organization (Subramaniam and Youndt, 2005;Weerakoon et al, 2019).…”
Section: Innovation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We posit that it is pertinent for organizations to consciously design and implement an explicit set of KHRM practices from the SCT perspective (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998) to develop and strengthen innovation performance (Donate et al, 2016). Therefore, a firm's HRM practices should select employees based on their potential than current knowledge, skills, and experience (Lepak and Snell, 2002) for them to participate in learning unique knowledge necessary for the social capital of the organization (Subramaniam and Youndt, 2005;Weerakoon et al, 2019).…”
Section: Innovation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRM practices grounded in the opportunity-motivation-ability philosophy facilitate employees' innovative behavior and overall innovativeness in the social enterprise (Weerakoon et al, 2019). This literature suggests to redefine and reposition traditional HRM into KHRM for enabling coworkers to engage in knowledge creation and sharing activities to support innovative behavior (Minbaeva, 2013) as KHMR enhances knowledge flows in the organization (Donate and de Pablo, 2015).…”
Section: Innovation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with high innovativeness, combined with the desire to solve social problems, are highly likely to become social entrepreneurs in the future (Gur-Erdogan et al, 2014; Ip et al, 2018; Mueller & Thomas, 2001). In addition, innovativeness is considered the core competence to solve social problems, and it is closely related to social entrepreneurship (Gur-Erdogan et al, 2014; Weerakoon et al, 2020). As a change agent, social entrepreneurs exploit innovation at the system level to bring about change in a social equilibrium (Partzsch & Ziegler, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Background Research Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998) viewed social capital as the resource that individuals obtain from their relational networks. A higher level of social capital has been associated with a level of job satisfaction (L. V. Huang & Liu, 2017), emotional support (Kikuchi & Coleman, 2012), the effectiveness of workgroups (Oh et al, 2004), creation of intellectual capital and dissemination of knowledge within an organization (Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998), firm innovativeness (Weerakoon et al, 2020), and a low level of employeeexit rates (Jensen et al, 2019). However, Pillai et al (2017) suggested that there are possible negative effects of social capital such as dilution of the dialectical process and nonrational escalation of commitment.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%