Social Capital and Household Welfare in Kwara State, Nigeria

Yusuf, S. A.

doi:10.1080/09709274.2008.11906074

Cited by 64 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Modal sosial telah terbukti berperan dalam pengurangan kemiskinan di Indonesia (Grootaert, 1999;Vipriyanti, 2007;Slamet, 2010;Nasution, et al, 2014aNasution, et al, , 2014b. Penelitian di negaranegara berkembang lain juga menunjukkan peran penting modal sosial dalam mengurangi kemiskinan (Narayan & Pritchett, 1999;Grootaert, 2001;Grootaert, et al, 2002aGrootaert, et al, , 2002bGrootaert, et al, , 2002cAker, 2007;Okunmadewa, et al, 2005Okunmadewa, et al, , 2007Yusuf, 2008;Hassan & Birungi, 2011;Tenzin, et al, 2013).…”

Section: Gambar 1 Perkembangan Tingkat Kemiskinan Indonesiaunclassified

“…Pengukuran kemiskinan dengan menggunakan pendekatan pengeluaran per kapita rumah tangga telah digunakan dalam berbagai penelitian (Grootaert, 1999;Grootaert & Bastelaer, 2002a, 2002bAker, 2007;Okunmadewa, et al, 2007;Yusuf, 2008;Hassan & Birungi, 2011;Kirori, et al, 2011;Adepoju & Oni, 2012;Tenzin, et al, 2013;Baiyegunhi, 2014).…”

Section: Definisi Dan Pengukuran Variabel 1 Variabel Kemiskinanunclassified

“…Kemiskinan di perdesaan dipengaruhi oleh modal sosial, modal manusia, modal fisik, modal keuangan, karakteristik demografi kepala rumah tangga, dan karakteristik sosial-ekonomi rumah tangga (ukuran rumah tangga dan pekerjaan kepala rumah tangga) (Aker, 2007;Yusuf, 2008;Abdul-Hakim, et al, 2010;Hassan & Birungi, 2011;Adepoju & Oni, 2012;Tenzin, et al, 2013;Anyanwu, 2011Anyanwu, , 2014.…”

Section: Variabel Bebas Lainnyaunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Kebijakan Pembentukan Modal Sosial Dan Pengurangan Kemiskinan Di Rumah Tangga Perdesaan Indonesia

Nasution¹

2017

JEKP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstrakKebijakan pengurangan kemiskinan di Indonesia cenderung mengandalkan pendekatan ekonomi, seperti pembangunan infrastruktur (modal fisik), bantuan kredit (modal keuangan), dan bantuan pendidikan dan kesehatan (modal manusia). Padahal, kemiskinan merupakan persoalan yang kompleks, melibatkan banyak sumber daya termasuk modal sosial. Penelitian ini menganalisis peran modal sosial terhadap kemiskinan rumah tangga perdesaan di Indonesia. Modal sosial diukur berdasarkan indeks dimensi modal sosial (saling percaya, norma, gotong royong, partisipasi dalam kegiatan sosial, dan jejaring sosial), sedangkan kemiskinan diukur dengan pengeluaran per kapita rumah tangga. Metode analisis menggunakan model regresi linier berganda pada sampel sebanyak 40.474 rumah tangga. Adapun sumber data dari hasil survei berskala nasional yang dilakukan oleh BPS, yaitu Susenas tahun 2012 dan Podes tahun 2011. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata indeks modal sosial rumah tangga di perdesaan sebesar 52,18 (maksimum 100). Adapun komponen yang paling berperan dalam pembentukan modal sosial rumah tangga miskin adalah rasa saling percaya. Hasil analisis juga menunjukkan bahwa modal sosial bersama-sama dengan modal manusia, modal keuangan, dan modal fisik memberikan efek positif terhadap pengeluaran per kapita rumah tangga, sehingga dapat mengurangi kemiskinan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa modal sosial berperan penting dalam pengurangan kemiskinan di perdesaan. Pemerintah dan pihak terkait diharapkan membuat kebijakan yang memfasilitasi pengembangan modal sosial dalam upaya pengurangan kemiskinan di perdesaan Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: Gambar 1 Perkembangan Tingkat Kemiskinan Indonesiaunclassified

Section: Definisi Dan Pengukuran Variabel 1 Variabel Kemiskinanunclassified

Section: Variabel Bebas Lainnyaunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Kebijakan Pembentukan Modal Sosial Dan Pengurangan Kemiskinan Di Rumah Tangga Perdesaan Indonesia

Nasution¹

2017

JEKP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the measurements of Z, X and Y do not allow for the identification of the average causal effect of X on Y. Earlier studies used trust as an instrumental variable to verify the endogeneity effect of social capital (Narayan & Putnam (2000) and Yusuf (2008). We therefore used other instruments proposed by Aker (2005), which are household's length of residency in its present locations, charity contribution in the past year and membership of a faith-based organization.…”

Section: Do Social Network Have Effects On the Risk Attitude Of Commmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Social Networks have Effects on the Risk Attitude of Commercial Poultry Farmers? Evidence from Southwest Nigeria

Obayelu

Olowe

Faleye

2017

Rural Sustainability Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Poultry production decision setting is full of risk and imperfect information. Attitude towards risk is a measure of farmers' willingness to take risks which is an important determinant in their production decisions. Strong social capital emanating from social networks can lead to efficient risk management strategies, thereby minimizing risks faced by the farmers. Therefore, the effects of social capital on the risk attitude of small-scale commercial poultry farmers in Oyo state were assessed. Data were collected from two hundred small-scale farmers and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, factorial analysis, multinomial logit and a two-stage least square. Results showed that 52.5%, 37.5% and 10% of the poultry farmers were risk averse, risk neutral and risk preferring, respectively. About 31.4% and 68.6% of the female and male farmers respectively were risk averse. Close to a fifth, a quarter and two-thirds of the risk averse, risk neutral and risk takers respectively contributed 21-30% of the decisions in the associations. Fourteen percent of the farmers belonged to homogeneous groups. The choice of being risk averse was affected by marital status, educational level, family size, percentage spent on poultry income and aggregate social capital. There was no reverse causality between risk attitude and social capital.

show abstract

“…Narayan and Pritchett (1999) in a study in Tanzania found that social capital is an important determinant of household income. According to a study in Nigeria by Yusuf (2008), also found that social capital affects household welfare. The multifaceted phenomenon of social capital linked to numerous social outcomes.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Capital and Quality of Life in Multi-storey Housing Neighbourhood Community

Hamdan

Yusof

Marzukhi

et al. 2018

AjQoL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social capital is a valuable asset with positive consequences on societal well-being, strengthen neighbourhood and increase the quality of life. The objective of this paper is to analyse a few dimensions of social capital in the multi-storey housing neighbourhoods community with household questionnaires survey of 797 samples. The findings demonstrated the bonding of social capital according to four dimensions. Different neighbourhoods in a different locality with the diversity of its people, and surrounding developments have influenced the pattern of social capital. Social capital in these community creates positive social values that contributes to increasing the quality of life.

show abstract

Social Capital and Household Welfare in Kwara State, Nigeria

Cited by 64 publications

References 2 publications

Kebijakan Pembentukan Modal Sosial Dan Pengurangan Kemiskinan Di Rumah Tangga Perdesaan Indonesia

Kebijakan Pembentukan Modal Sosial Dan Pengurangan Kemiskinan Di Rumah Tangga Perdesaan Indonesia

Do Social Networks have Effects on the Risk Attitude of Commercial Poultry Farmers? Evidence from Southwest Nigeria

Social Capital and Quality of Life in Multi-storey Housing Neighbourhood Community

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About