2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social behaviour of buffalo heifers during the establishment of a dominance hierarchy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-groom, or broadly, self-directed behaviour in animals, is a widely used indicator of stress-related responses, contributed by social (e.g., hierarchical group structure) or non-social (e.g., presence of ectoparasites) factors 48,8789 . Finally, avoiding (specific) conspecifics can be attributed to the hierarchical social structure of buffalo (see 90 ), which may help reduce conflicts, competition and disease transmission within the herd 91 . However, counterintuitively, approach behaviour positively co-varied with self-groom and avoidance (of conspecifics), indicating aspects of both sociability and tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-groom, or broadly, self-directed behaviour in animals, is a widely used indicator of stress-related responses, contributed by social (e.g., hierarchical group structure) or non-social (e.g., presence of ectoparasites) factors 48,8789 . Finally, avoiding (specific) conspecifics can be attributed to the hierarchical social structure of buffalo (see 90 ), which may help reduce conflicts, competition and disease transmission within the herd 91 . However, counterintuitively, approach behaviour positively co-varied with self-groom and avoidance (of conspecifics), indicating aspects of both sociability and tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local indices were the centralities of the vertices, such as the degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector centrality. These indices quantify different aspects of an individ-ual's position within the network (Makagon et al, 2012). The definition, interpretation, and mathematical formulae of all global and local indices are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Indices Of the Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se considera lineal una jerarquía con índice de Landau superior a 0.9, en grupos de animales machos (17,18) , como en grupos de cabríos estabulados, los cuales presentan una clara gradación jerárquica, con linealidades de 0.92 y 0.99 (25) y en grupos de borregas existe una estructura social significativamente jerárquica (26) . En el caso de vaquillas de búfalo, se presenta del 55.24 % de dominancia unidireccional en pastizales grandes y del 54 al 63 % de dominancia unidireccional en pequeños pastizales, clasificando a los grupos como jerarquía semi-lineal (27) . Cabe señalar que no existe reporte de rangos jerárquicos en grupos mixtos de ovinos en condiciones de pastoreo.…”
Section: Pruebas De Dominanciaunclassified