2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00220-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and political factors influencing the functioning of regional health boards in British Columbia (Canada)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally acknowledged that regionalization has brought changes in public health governance, leadership, power dynamics, system infrastructure, and visibility, as well as new opportunities for service integration and reorientation to a population focus (Braunstein et al, 2000;Kothari and Edwards, 2003). Various reports have highlighted the challenges and negative impact of regionalization on the Canadian public health system (Sutcliffe et al, 1997;Kluge, 1999;Braunstein et al, 2000;Casebeer et al, 2000;Lewis et al, 2001;Frankish et al, 2002;Kothari and Edwards, 2003;Moloughney, 2005;Jensen and Kisely, 2005), and the need for systematic evaluation of the impact of regionalization (Moloughney, 2006). The public health management participants in this study found themselves caught in the power struggle between provincial and regional systems and within the DHA structure itself, constantly justifying their existence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally acknowledged that regionalization has brought changes in public health governance, leadership, power dynamics, system infrastructure, and visibility, as well as new opportunities for service integration and reorientation to a population focus (Braunstein et al, 2000;Kothari and Edwards, 2003). Various reports have highlighted the challenges and negative impact of regionalization on the Canadian public health system (Sutcliffe et al, 1997;Kluge, 1999;Braunstein et al, 2000;Casebeer et al, 2000;Lewis et al, 2001;Frankish et al, 2002;Kothari and Edwards, 2003;Moloughney, 2005;Jensen and Kisely, 2005), and the need for systematic evaluation of the impact of regionalization (Moloughney, 2006). The public health management participants in this study found themselves caught in the power struggle between provincial and regional systems and within the DHA structure itself, constantly justifying their existence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the WKB, the establishment of a regional health authority governance framework provides a platform by which the resolution of various competing interests can be achieved through greater attention to local input and conditions, but in no way mollifies the potential for conflict. [52][53][54] Lines of accountability, funding flows, program development, and organizational structures must ultimately work within the confines of finite resources, but with the goal of maximizing support within a given jurisdiction for those in need of care, their families, and informal support networks. At the level of practice, there is likewise a need for recognition of, and respect for, the talents and capacities of others in the field.…”
Section: Implications For Palliative Care Practice and Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problemas nos resultados da descentralização têm sido relacionados com fatores sociais e políticos 3 , particularmente quanto à estratégia 4 e aos conflitos decisórios 5 . Embora haja um consenso sobre os benefícios potenciais do processo de descentralização, os resultados diferenciados e mesmo negativos da sua operacionalização mostram que essa política não é uma panacéia, dependendo da mediação de um conjunto de fatores políticos, sociais e relacionais 6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified