2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00213-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and academic intelligences: a multitrait–multimethod study of their crystallized and fluid characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the size of the correlations suggest that interviewees' ATIC was not tantamount to cognitive ability. This result is in line with the literature on social effectiveness constructs (Jones & Day, 1997;Lee et al, 2000;Weis & Süß, 2007). It is also notable that the correlation between ATIC and verbal ability was significant (albeit only marginally for the externally-coded ATIC scores), whereas the correlations with figural ability were not significant.…”
Section: Main Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the size of the correlations suggest that interviewees' ATIC was not tantamount to cognitive ability. This result is in line with the literature on social effectiveness constructs (Jones & Day, 1997;Lee et al, 2000;Weis & Süß, 2007). It is also notable that the correlation between ATIC and verbal ability was significant (albeit only marginally for the externally-coded ATIC scores), whereas the correlations with figural ability were not significant.…”
Section: Main Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A common thread running through the research on social effectiveness is the attempt to distinguish this construct from cognitive ability. In line with this thread, social effectiveness constructs and cognitive ability often covary with each other (e.g., Jones & Day, 1997;Lee, Wong, Day, Maxwell, & Thorpe, 2000;Weis & Süß, 2007). Often, however, the correlations only reach a moderate level of about .20, and the empirical evidence shows that the two constructs can be distinguished from each other (Jones & Day, 1997;Lee et al, 2000;Weis & Süß, 2007).…”
Section: Atic and Cognitive Abilitymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Elsewhere a previous study by Lee, Wong, Day, Maxwell, and Thorpe (2000) sought to determine whether the fluid and/or crystallized distinction of intelligence could be applied to the concept of social intelligence. Within their study, social knowledge was hypothesized to reflect crystallized social intelligence, whereas social inference was hypothesized to reflect fluid social intelligence.…”
Section: Developing Ei As a Set Of Emotional Abilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Вучић (Vučić, 1982) под социјалном интелигенцијом под-разумева способност процењивања односа између људи, разумевање поступака људи, као и процењивање реаговања на поступке других људи у социјалним одно-сима. Данас, истраживачи социјалну интелигенцију посматрају као способност за адекватно поступање у међуљудским односима (Doğan & Eryılmaz, 2014;Frankovský & Birknerová, 2011;Weis & Süß, 2007), сматрају је новом науком о људским односима (Goleman, 2007) и одређују као вишедимензионалну способност (Goleman, 2006;Lee et al, 2000;Posavec, 2010;Wong et al, 1995).…”
Section: теоријска полазишта истраживањаunclassified