2018
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-8449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Accountability and Service Delivery: Experimental Evidence from Uganda

Abstract: Corruption and mismanagement of public resources can affect the quality of government services and undermine growth. Can citizens in poor communities be empowered to demand better-quality public investments? We look at whether providing social accountability training and information on project performance can lead to improvements in local development projects. The program we study is unique in its size and integration in a national program. We find that offering communities a combination of training and inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, they are consistent with previous work suggesting that social incentives such as nonfinancial awards can be used to boost worker performance in mission-oriented settings (Ashraf et al 2014), as well as other experimental settings (Kosfeld and Neckermann 2011) and the private sector (Markham et al 2002). Empowering citizens through community monitoring has also been examined as a tool for improving service delivery in a variety of social sectors, including education (Banerjee et al 2010;Pradhan et al 2011;Barr et al 2012;Andrabi et al 2018), corruption (Fiala and Premand 2018;Olken 2007) and health. As discussed above, our results align closely with Björkman and Svensson (2009), but are further from the more recent work of Raffler et al (2019) who also examine community monitoring of health clinics in Uganda, but find weak effects.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Instead, they are consistent with previous work suggesting that social incentives such as nonfinancial awards can be used to boost worker performance in mission-oriented settings (Ashraf et al 2014), as well as other experimental settings (Kosfeld and Neckermann 2011) and the private sector (Markham et al 2002). Empowering citizens through community monitoring has also been examined as a tool for improving service delivery in a variety of social sectors, including education (Banerjee et al 2010;Pradhan et al 2011;Barr et al 2012;Andrabi et al 2018), corruption (Fiala and Premand 2018;Olken 2007) and health. As discussed above, our results align closely with Björkman and Svensson (2009), but are further from the more recent work of Raffler et al (2019) who also examine community monitoring of health clinics in Uganda, but find weak effects.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The enumerator experiment described in this paper was conducted during the data collection of a separate research project, described in detail in Fiala and Premand (2018).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most studied area for included interventions is Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 13), representing almost 40 per cent of the included studies. We included five studies of interventions that took place in Uganda (Björkman et al, 2017(Björkman et al, , 2009incorporating Donato & Mosqueira, 2016;Fiala & Premand, 2017;Grossman et al, 2017;Grossman & Michelitch, 2018;Humphreys & Weinstein, 2012), two from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (Humphreys et al, 2014;Palladium, 2015), one each respectively from Ghana (Alhassan et al, 2016), Tanzania , Madagascar (Rasamoelina et al, 2015), Malawi (Gullo et al, 2017), Namibia (Bandyopadhyay et al, 2004) and a study that took place in both Kenya and Guinea (Bradley & Igras, 2005).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitated citizen feedback covers interventions that solicited concerns from citizens through community meetings or focus groups in order to feed back to service providers, often using a local facilitator or civil society organization, for example Björkman et al (2017;2009) and Ananthpur et al (2016). Unfacilitated feedback interventions gave citizens the tools or opportunities to give feedback or monitor but the collection of these concerns is not through a facilitated group meeting, for example Fiala & Premand (2017) which trains communities to monitor community CDD projects, as well as identify and make complaints about corruption and mismanagement, but does not set up forums to do so. We only identified one study that used technology to solicit feedback on service provision, namely Grossman et al's (2017) study of the U-Bridge programme in Uganda that introduced a SMS-based service for citizens and local government officials to submit, monitor and respond to requests around public service delivery.…”
Section: Interventions and Pita Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation