1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199611)10:4<249::aid-per265>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social acceptance and the relationship between aggressive problem-solving strategies and aggressive behaviour in 14-year-old adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, among women, any act of violence-regardless of the impact on the victim-may be viewed as essentially the same. Th is interpretation is consistent with the results of Pakaslahti and Keltikangas-Jarvinen (1997). Th ese authors reported that-among a sample of adolescents-when presented with descriptors of aggressive behaviors, boys were more likely than girls to legitimize the aggression by focusing on factors that might "excuse" the aggression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In contrast, among women, any act of violence-regardless of the impact on the victim-may be viewed as essentially the same. Th is interpretation is consistent with the results of Pakaslahti and Keltikangas-Jarvinen (1997). Th ese authors reported that-among a sample of adolescents-when presented with descriptors of aggressive behaviors, boys were more likely than girls to legitimize the aggression by focusing on factors that might "excuse" the aggression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This study is part of a larger follow-up project investigating the development of social decision-making strategies, moral reasoning, and social behaviour in adolescents (see, e.g., Keltikangas-Ja È rvinen & Kangas, 1988;Lindeman et al, 1997;Pakaslahti & Keltikangas-Ja È rvinen, 1996;Pakaslahti & Keltikangas-Ja È rvinen, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has previously been shown that peer nominations result in three factors: aggressive behaviour, prosocial behaviour and submissiveness (Pakaslahti & Keltikangas-Ja È rvinen, 1996). The unweighted least squares factor analysis with oblique rotation (direct oblimin) conducted here also produced three factors which were possible to name identically with the previous factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggressive-accepted students saw themselves as sociable, and sociable-rejected ones perceived themselves as aggressive. Thus, social feedback was likely to modify their self-concept, and produced an effect such that the strategies were not in line with the behaviour (see Table 2; for details, see Pakaslahti and Keltikangas-Järvinen, 1997).…”
Section: Role Of Peersmentioning
confidence: 99%