2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOCCAR: A randomised phase II trial comparing sequential versus concurrent chemotherapy and radical hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with inoperable stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and good performance status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
93
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
93
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2-year survival rates were 50% vs 46% for concurrent and sequential arm, respectively. 19 The observations are in agreement with the findings in our report. However, the cumulative BED of the concurrent chemoradiation arms of the two studies were different (70 vs 59.5 Gy), and the relatively favourable grade $3 toxicity profile of the present study can be attributed to the less cumulative BED in the Arm B of our study.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2-year survival rates were 50% vs 46% for concurrent and sequential arm, respectively. 19 The observations are in agreement with the findings in our report. However, the cumulative BED of the concurrent chemoradiation arms of the two studies were different (70 vs 59.5 Gy), and the relatively favourable grade $3 toxicity profile of the present study can be attributed to the less cumulative BED in the Arm B of our study.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although the cumulative BED in the study arm of the present report is less than that used in the above studies, 12,[19][20][21] the response rates, toxicity and survival outcomes were consistent with reported literature. The consistency in the results among the studies underscores the fact that treatment acceleration is as important as achieving a higher BED and EQD2.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…This regimen has not been formally tested against 2 Gy per fraction alternatives. It has been reported in a cohort study [14], comparing favourably with CHART and in a phase II trial [24] of sequential versus concurrent chemoradiation, in which it was shown to be tolerable and with promising disease control. Further studies should formally test the relative effectiveness and toxicity of this regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Dose escalation by modified fractionation as the primary strategy to increase LC has been explored in several phase I and II studies . In 2015 the RTOG 0617 trial, which applied conventional dose escalation, was negative for the experimental arm in terms of LC and OS .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%