2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quality of Curative-intent Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the ongoing uncertainty regarding the optimal dose for curative-intent radiation therapy for NSCLC, and the high levels of toxicity, it is not surprising that radiation therapy practice varies 12, 14, 15. Recent advances are, however, enabling radiation therapy to be delivered with lower toxicity than previously, so knowledge regarding the optimal dose for curative-intent radiation therapy is becoming more important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the ongoing uncertainty regarding the optimal dose for curative-intent radiation therapy for NSCLC, and the high levels of toxicity, it is not surprising that radiation therapy practice varies 12, 14, 15. Recent advances are, however, enabling radiation therapy to be delivered with lower toxicity than previously, so knowledge regarding the optimal dose for curative-intent radiation therapy is becoming more important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, SABR has been adopted widely across the world. In the UK, the delivery of both conventional EBRT and SABR for ES lung cancer has recently been audited by McAleese et al 25 They found high levels of conformance with quality standards, including respiratory compensation, and onset verification with cone beam image-guided RT in the UK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiation of infection from colonization is possible by quantification of copy number (qPCR) [14]. In our study we used qPCR to determine PJ infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actuarial survival was calculated using MEDCALC version 9.3.9.0 and using the Kaplan Meier method. PJP was considered proven if microbiological or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) tests were positive in the presence of clinical and radiological signs of progressive pneumonia [14] (table 1). PJP was considered possible when there were clinical signs of progressive pneumonia and either compatible radiological signs or complete resolution after PJP treatment but with absence of microbiological or qPCR confirmation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%