Sobre a melhoria da produção e da avaliação de periódicos científicos no Brasil

Abstract

Abstract

Sistema de avaliação de periódicos no Brasil: Impactos da evolução dos critérios do Qualis-periódicos da Área de Educação

“…Avaliar, portanto, faz-se necessário para orientar políticas públicas para o incentivo do setor acadêmico. Contudo, avaliar a produção de conhecimento pode ser abstrato pode prever punição por ações estratégicas implantadas no passado; mas também pode promover reflexões positivas sobre como agir no futuro, oferecendo estabilidade ao próprio sistema de avaliação, desde que seja visível e permita as correções necessárias para ajustes e melhorias (PONCE et al, 2017).…”

Judging of multidisciplinary articles for the Meta Journal: Evaluation: Construction and validation of an instrument

“…The criteria used for evaluation are often the target of negative judgments and disapproval Multidisciplinary Perspectives: Integrating Knowledge Judging of multidisciplinary articles for the Meta Journal: Evaluation: Construction and validation of an instrument by the Programs, which suffer from a lack of funds and structure to keep their journals within the increasingly demanding criteria. According to Ponce et al (2017Ponce et al ( , p. 1032), the problems are diverse, such as: Lack of visibility on the evaluation processes, absence of dialogue about results and issues related to the periodicity of QUALIS [which] bring insecurity to authors who have in journals the vehicle for disseminating their practices and theories.…”

“…In the Brazilian context of Higher Education Institutions, especially public ones, associating cost with the quality of a journal brings more pretensions and concerns to editors, authors, researchers, librarians, among many other actors involved in this process of seeking to improve Brazilian scientific journals. The pressure of internationalization of Brazilian journals with publication in a foreign language is one of the factors linked to the high cost of production (Ponce et al, 2017).…”

Editorial (v.13, n.1, jan./jun. 2018) - Education and management of newspapers - new paths and perspectives in Science

“…In the last two years, from 2016 until the present day, several points about scientific production have been discussed: a) Open Access, accompanied by the question: who pays the bill?, considering more and more investments in researches and journals are being reduced due to public institutions' budgetary restraints; b) preprints, the publication of articles in an open access repository, in which the evaluation will no longer be through blind peer review, and with this, science becomes open and journals will be able to stamp publications, but at the same time, journals will be able to submit the texts to new blind peer reviews; c) the formation of the editorial team with editorial skills and administrative management, considering each journal has its technical, administrative and scientific management, requiring specific skills for this; d) continuous publication, from which there will be no more numbers, only one volume, and, as the articles are approved, they are already published; e) norms and guidelines for submission of manuscripts, one of the fundamental points in order to speed up the processes of publishing and publication of the manuscripts: "Raise awareness of (PONCE et al, 2017(PONCE et al, , p.1039; f) the possibility of evaluating production by the impact factor, which would have a direct impact on the scientific productions of the programs; g) the possibility of collecting revisions, translations, processing, formatting, standardization and technical advice, although this is already a practice of some journals for their survival; h) the requirement for all authors to have the ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID), a unique code for each author, an alphanumeric code to identify exclusively scientists and other academic authors and contributors -a mandatory item, all authors must have a registration in ORCID.…”