2017
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOAP Opera: Self as Object and Agent in Prioritizing Attention

Abstract: A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that multiple sources of salience tune attentional sets toward aspects of the environment, including affectively and motivationally significant categories of stimuli such as angry faces and reward-associated target locations. Recent evidence further indicates that objects that have gained personal significance through ownership can elicit similar attentional prioritization. Here we discuss current research on sources of attentional prioritization that shape our aware… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
3
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional experimentation is needed to establish the reliability of this effect. This unexpected finding aside, the current work nevertheless underscores the value of drift diffusion modeling when exploring self-prioritization effects in perceptual decision-making (Humphreys and Sui 2016;Sui and Humphreys 2015;Truong and Todd 2017). To fully realize the potential of this approach, future research should consider the effects of ownership on a wider range of objects (e.g., desirable vs. undesirable items, valuable vs. worthless items) among culturally diverse samples to pinpoint exactly when and how self-relevance triggers stimulus prioritization during decisional processing.…”
Section: Ownership and Decisional Processingmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Additional experimentation is needed to establish the reliability of this effect. This unexpected finding aside, the current work nevertheless underscores the value of drift diffusion modeling when exploring self-prioritization effects in perceptual decision-making (Humphreys and Sui 2016;Sui and Humphreys 2015;Truong and Todd 2017). To fully realize the potential of this approach, future research should consider the effects of ownership on a wider range of objects (e.g., desirable vs. undesirable items, valuable vs. worthless items) among culturally diverse samples to pinpoint exactly when and how self-relevance triggers stimulus prioritization during decisional processing.…”
Section: Ownership and Decisional Processingmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Intriguingly, variants of these self-biases have also been observed in other primates; notably chimpanzees, orangutans, and capuchin monkeys (e.g., Brosnan et al 2007;Chen et al 2006;Lakshminarayanan et al 2008). Given the primacy of self-other differentiation during early perceptual processing (Northoff 2016;Reddy 2008;Ruffman 2004;Truong and Todd 2017), it is perhaps unsurprising that cultural differences in selfconstrual do not influence the effects of ownership on object categorization (Humphreys and Sui 2016;Sui and Humphreys 2015;Truong and Todd, 2017). As previously noted, however, future research should investigate this issue in greater detail to establish exactly when cultural factors do, and do not, impact object processing and response generation.…”
Section: Ownership and Object Identificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been argued before that visual body perception triggers attentional focus (Weaver and Lauwereyns 2011;Gluckman and Johnson 2013;Solyst and Buffalo 2014), perhaps via attentional prioritization (Truong and Todd 2016). Attentional prioritization also modulates hippocampal networks, and the PPC (Cordova et al 2016;Levichkina et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%