2007
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2007022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNP mapping of QTL affecting growth and fatness on chicken GGA1

Abstract: -An F2 chicken population was established from a crossbreeding between a Xinghua line and a White Recessive Rock line. A total of 502 F2 chickens in 17 full-sib families from six hatches was obtained, and phenotypic data of 488 individuals were available for analysis. A total of 46 SNP on GGA1 was initially selected based on the average physical distance using the dbSNP database of NCBI. After the polymorphism levels in all F0 individuals (26 individuals) and part of the F1 individuals (22 individuals) were ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The novel QTLs identified could be false positives, exclusive to our population, or a consequence of the number of animals and the higher SNP density compared to other QTL mapping studies for abdominal fat and skin traits in chickens [ 5 , 8 14 ]. The PPA (ranging from 0.83 to 0.93) and the proportion of the genetic variance explained by the novel QTLs (ranging from 0.58 to 1.49) suggest that these novel QTL are not false positives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The novel QTLs identified could be false positives, exclusive to our population, or a consequence of the number of animals and the higher SNP density compared to other QTL mapping studies for abdominal fat and skin traits in chickens [ 5 , 8 14 ]. The PPA (ranging from 0.83 to 0.93) and the proportion of the genetic variance explained by the novel QTLs (ranging from 0.58 to 1.49) suggest that these novel QTL are not false positives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have been conducted to map genomic quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with variation in abdominal fat [ 5 , 9 13 ], and skin traits [ 9 , 14 ]. However, most previously published QTLs were mapped using low density of markers (ranging from 102 to 410 markers), and the detected intervals spanned tens of centimorgans (cM) [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADG was calculated based on the difference between the current BW and the BW of two weeks ago for 1–14, 15–28, 29–42, 43–56, 57–70, and 71–84 d of age (ADG14, ADG28, ADG42, ADG56, ADG70, and ADG84). For example, ADG28 was calculated as (BW28 – BW14)/14 and represented the net daily weight increase during the period of 15–28 d. All 489 F2 individuals (252 males and 237 females) were slaughtered and measured for BMW (g), LMW (g), and WW (g) at 90 d of age [13], [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been some success in explaining body condition variation using genetic markers by exploring the correlation between body condition or body fat and genetic markers in controlled crosses (QTL analysis) (e.g. Abasht et al 2006;Moghadam et al 2007;Rao et al 2007;Kü ttner et al 2011). However, this method is laborious and difficult to achieve in nonmodel organisms that cannot be kept and crossed in laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%