2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00107-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snowpack processing of acetaldehyde and acetone in the Arctic atmospheric boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
109
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
13
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are no Br 2 or Cl 2 measurements aloft of the surface in the Arctic. Utilizing the method of Guimbaud et al (2002), the effective mixing height, Z*, for Cl 2 at mid-day is only 2.15 m, making the calculated Cl 2 fluxes 1.2 × 10 8 -3.1 × 10 8 molecules cm −2 s −1 ; Z* for Br 2 is 0.5 m, leading to a calculated Br 2 flux of 5.0 × 10 4 -4.5 × 10 8 molecules cm −2 s −1 . Therefore, field studies aimed at determining the magnitude of the surface flux of Cl 2 and Br 2 are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are no Br 2 or Cl 2 measurements aloft of the surface in the Arctic. Utilizing the method of Guimbaud et al (2002), the effective mixing height, Z*, for Cl 2 at mid-day is only 2.15 m, making the calculated Cl 2 fluxes 1.2 × 10 8 -3.1 × 10 8 molecules cm −2 s −1 ; Z* for Br 2 is 0.5 m, leading to a calculated Br 2 flux of 5.0 × 10 4 -4.5 × 10 8 molecules cm −2 s −1 . Therefore, field studies aimed at determining the magnitude of the surface flux of Cl 2 and Br 2 are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this modeling study suggests that Br 2 should indeed be present in the daytime (given the agreement with observed [BrO]), though it is acknowledged that there is some degree of interference from HOBr, as is apparent from the model overprediction of BrO on 31 March. Considering an e-folding photolytic lifetime of Br 2 at solar noon of 23 s (J max = 0.044 s −1 ), and using the method of Guimbaud et al (2002), the effective daytime mixing height (Z*) of Br 2 in the stable air typical of the Arctic (K c = 95 cm 2 s −1 ) is ∼ 0.5 m. Assuming simple first-order kinetics, the [Br 2 ] remaining after mixing up from the surface to the intake of the CIMS (∼ 1 m or 2 lifetimes) is 10 % that at the surface. A recent study examining Br 2 production from surface snow in Barrow demonstrates that enhanced Br 2 production is observed in the presence of solar radiation (Pratt et al, 2013).…”
Section: Comparison Of Modeled and Observed Mole Ratios For Select Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these compounds have been detected in surface snow even in the remote polar areas [15,42,43]. Moreover, the emissions of several volatile compounds from the sunlit snow have been observed in the Arctic [44][45][46] influencing the chemistry in the boundary layer in snow-covered areas [2]. OH radicals can also contribute to the formation and release of molecular chlorine (Cl 2 ) and bromine (Br 2 ) if the snow contains chloride and bromide [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OC records in glaciers are of great significance to global carbon dynamics, snow photochemistry, and air-snow exchange processes (Antony et al, 2011;Niu et al, 2017a). It was also known that photochemical reactions of OC in snow and ice can release reactive gaseous species into the overlying atmosphere (Guimbaud et al, 2002;Grannas et al, 2004;Niu et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%