2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snow-covered Landsat time series stacks improve automated disturbance mapping accuracy in forested landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, forest clearcuts in temperate forests can be more easily detected in winter due to the high radiance contrast in the image data (Püssa et al 2005;Liira et al 2006;Kardakov et al 2009). For example, Pinder et al (1999) successfully mapped pine forest with winter images, and Stueve et al (2011) improved overall accuracy from 86.3% to 91.2% when including winter imagery in order to map mixed forests of the Great Lake basin. In China, bamboo understory in panda habitats is difficult to map with summer images alone, because both understory and canopy provide similar radiance in summertime, but winter images improved the classification accuracy up to 89% (Wang et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, forest clearcuts in temperate forests can be more easily detected in winter due to the high radiance contrast in the image data (Püssa et al 2005;Liira et al 2006;Kardakov et al 2009). For example, Pinder et al (1999) successfully mapped pine forest with winter images, and Stueve et al (2011) improved overall accuracy from 86.3% to 91.2% when including winter imagery in order to map mixed forests of the Great Lake basin. In China, bamboo understory in panda habitats is difficult to map with summer images alone, because both understory and canopy provide similar radiance in summertime, but winter images improved the classification accuracy up to 89% (Wang et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an algorithm developed by Huang et al 2010 [29] has been implemented wall-to-wall for the continental US and has been shown to be very effective at mapping clear cut harvest, but has also been noted to have difficulty in complex heterogeneous landscapes [40]. This algorithm uses the concept of normalized values for pixels based on the mean and standard deviation of known forest pixels from the same scene and uses multiple images to improve the forest/non-forest classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathieu et al 2007;Myint et al 2011), some widely used moderate-resolution products such as NLCD and Vegetation Change Tracker (e.g. Stueve et al 2011;Wickham et al 2013), and established thresholds for acceptable accuracy in land cover products (Shao and Wu 2008). The comparatively narrow adjusted area ranges of several individual high-resolution land cover classes demonstrate a higher degree of confidence in these respectively mapped areas.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%