Context. A fundamental property determining the transient behaviour of core-collapse supernovae (CC SNe) is the amount of radioactive 56 Ni synthesised in the explosion. Using established methods, this is a relatively easy parameter to extract from observations. Aims. I provide a meta analysis of all published 56 Ni masses for CC SNe. Methods. Collating a total of 258 literature 56 Ni masses I compare distributions of the main CC SN types: SNe II; SNe IIb; SNe Ib; SNe Ic; and SNe IcBL. Results. Using these published values, I calculate a median 56 Ni mass of 0.032 M for SNe II (N=115), 0.102 M (N=27) for SNe IIb, SNe Ib = 0.163 M (N=33), SNe Ic = 0.155 M (N=48), and SNe IcBL = 0.369 M (N=32). On average, stripped-enevelope SNe (SE-SNe: IIb; Ib; Ic; and Ic-BL) have much higher values than SNe II. These observed distributions are compared to those predicted from neutrino-driven explosion models. While the SN II distribution follows model predictions, the SE-SNe have a significant fraction of events with 56 Ni masses much higher than predicted.Conclusions. If the majority of published 56 Ni masses are to be believed, these results imply significant differences in the progenitor structures and/or explosion properties between SNe II and SE-SNe. However, such distinct progenitor and explosion properties are not currently favoured in the literature. Alternatively, the popular methods used to estimate 56 Ni masses for SE-SNe may not be accurate. Possible issues with these methods are discussed, as are the implications of true 56 Ni mass differences on progenitor properties of different CC SNe.