2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.916390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothing of substrate pits using ion beam deposition for EUV lithography

Abstract: Mitigation of pit-type defects proves to be a major hurdle facing the production of a defect-free mask blank for EUV lithography. Recent efforts have been directed toward substrate smoothing methods during deposition. The angle of incidence of the substrate is known to have a significant effect on the growth of defects during deposition. It has been shown that shadowing effects for bump-type defects are reduced when depositing Mo/Si films at near-normal incidence, resulting in a Gaussian growth profile in whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These defects include soft particles bonded to the surface via van der Waals forces, and hard particles which can be embedded in the substrate and leave a pit when removed [ 100 ]. Various pit smoothing techniques have been devised [ 101 ], however, these methods are limited by the ability to analyse the substrate to identify the defects which must be removed [ 102 , 103 ]. Furthermore, the compound effect of multiple mirrors results in low efficiency, with approximately 1–5% of the photons produced from the UV source interacting with the wafer.…”
Section: Conventional Lithographic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These defects include soft particles bonded to the surface via van der Waals forces, and hard particles which can be embedded in the substrate and leave a pit when removed [ 100 ]. Various pit smoothing techniques have been devised [ 101 ], however, these methods are limited by the ability to analyse the substrate to identify the defects which must be removed [ 102 , 103 ]. Furthermore, the compound effect of multiple mirrors results in low efficiency, with approximately 1–5% of the photons produced from the UV source interacting with the wafer.…”
Section: Conventional Lithographic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net phase change adds to the intrinsic effect of the core defect and its influence on the growth of the multilayer stack during deposition. Therefore, identifying this influence is critical and would help in determining strategies to mitigate the printability of such defects by employing various techniques like defect smoothing, 7 multilayer defect compensation technique, 8 or using an additional buffer layer, 9 to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%