2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-017-0389-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking Prevalence Among Users of Primary Healthcare Units in Brazil: The Role of Religiosity

Abstract: The objective of this cross-sectional study is to examine the association between religious involvement and tobacco use in a large representative sample of users of primary healthcare units of Ribeirão Preto, Southeast Brazil. Current and past smoking habits were determined among 1055 users of primary healthcare units. Participants' religiosity was measured using the DUREL questionnaire. The prevalence of smoking among men was 16.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.0-22.5] and among women was 12.6% (95% CI 10.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Research in the USA, for example, has linked greater religiosity with lower levels of smoking among both adults (Whooley et al 2002; Garcia et al 2013; Hayward et al 2016; Bowie et al 2017) and younger people (Alexander et al 2016; Nonnemaker et al 2006; Amey et al 1996; Wallace and Forman 1998). Elsewhere similar conclusions have been drawn for young people in Central America and the Dominican Republic (Chen et al 2004), Hungary (Kovacs et al 2011), Switzerland (Becker et al 2015), Iran (Ameri et al 2016) and Jordan (Alzyoud et al 2015), for adults in Brazil (Martinez et al 2017), mainland China (Wang et al 2015; Wang and Jang 2016), Zambia and Malawi (Pampel 2005) and South Africa (Prinsloo et al 2008), and for pregnant women in San Luis, Brazil (Barbosa et al 2015). Analogously, adults in South Korea have been found to be more likely to quit smoking if they are religious (Myung et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Research in the USA, for example, has linked greater religiosity with lower levels of smoking among both adults (Whooley et al 2002; Garcia et al 2013; Hayward et al 2016; Bowie et al 2017) and younger people (Alexander et al 2016; Nonnemaker et al 2006; Amey et al 1996; Wallace and Forman 1998). Elsewhere similar conclusions have been drawn for young people in Central America and the Dominican Republic (Chen et al 2004), Hungary (Kovacs et al 2011), Switzerland (Becker et al 2015), Iran (Ameri et al 2016) and Jordan (Alzyoud et al 2015), for adults in Brazil (Martinez et al 2017), mainland China (Wang et al 2015; Wang and Jang 2016), Zambia and Malawi (Pampel 2005) and South Africa (Prinsloo et al 2008), and for pregnant women in San Luis, Brazil (Barbosa et al 2015). Analogously, adults in South Korea have been found to be more likely to quit smoking if they are religious (Myung et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…As evidenced in other previous Brazilian studies 9,19,20,[34][35][36] , individuals affiliated to Evangelical religious groups are less susceptible to hazardous consumption of alcohol when compared with individuals from other religious groups. In fact, people from Evangelical backgrounds tend to have a proper lifestyle and they are more disposed to assume restrictive moral attitudes, including disapproval of smoking and drinking 37 .…”
Section: ▄ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several facts lead one to hypothesize that smokers are less likely to participate in charitable giving and give lesser amounts than nonsmokers. First, nonsmokers compared with smokers are more likely to be religious (Martinez, Giglio, Terada, da Silva, & Zucoloto, 2017; Roff et al, 2005), and religious people are more likely to participate in giving (Bekkers & Wiepking, 2011; Brown & Ferris, 2007) and give higher amounts (Bekkers & Wiepking, 2011). Second, smokers report lower level of indicators of social capital such as participation in organizational activities (Islam, Folland, & Kaarbøe, 2017; Siahpush et al, 2006) and trust in others (Hassanzadeh et al, 2016; Islam et al, 2017; Siahpush et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%