2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphone-based incentives for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(28 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, patients' beliefs towards CM have not been widely investigated. Research has been limited to surveys examining acceptability of study procedures among patients in receipt of CM in the USA [15][16][17][18][19] and a small UK-based qualitative investigation [20]. These studies found that patients view CM as a motivating and positive tool to facilitate recovery and the monitoring of behaviours and financial incentives are strengths of the intervention [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, patients' beliefs towards CM have not been widely investigated. Research has been limited to surveys examining acceptability of study procedures among patients in receipt of CM in the USA [15][16][17][18][19] and a small UK-based qualitative investigation [20]. These studies found that patients view CM as a motivating and positive tool to facilitate recovery and the monitoring of behaviours and financial incentives are strengths of the intervention [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology might optimise the application of reinforcement principles, monitoring and reinforcing the target behaviour more frequently than is otherwise possible [22,24]. A meta-analysis of mobile telephone-delivered CM [25] and more recent evaluation studies [19,[26][27][28][29][30] suggest these interventions are effective in generating positive behaviour change. However, the platforms upon which these interventions can be implemented might vary in their appropriateness or acceptability to the patient population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, patients would receive congratulations for attending the clinic three consecutive on-time visits for HIV care, and they were given a sticker to proudly place on an interactive poster publicly displayed in the clinic to celebrate and acknowledge their achievement [143]. Another study involved a multi-component positive affect intervention for MSM who used drugs, eight core skills, and meditation exercises were delivered to them to increase positive affect among HIV management Use of non-explicit commitment devices in the form of financial incentives for ART adherence and viral load suppression goal in the future [108,144,147,154,[169][170][171][172][173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181] Use of non-explicit commitment devices in the form of financial incentives to meet HIV testing, linkage to HIV care and clinic attendance goal in the future [172,182,183] Use of non-explicit commitment devices in the form of non-financial incentives for ART adherence and viral load suppression goal in the future [74,147,155] Use of non-explicit commitment devices in the form of non-financial incentives to meet HIV testing, linkage to HIV care and clinic attendance goal in the future [117,143,146,[184][185][186] Ego HIV prevention HIV education sessions alongside financial education programmes to target ego and self-efficacy [18,31,99,[187][188][189] HIV education sessions and peer support to target ego and increase HIV risk perception ...…”
Section: Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical studies it is common to provide these reinforcers in several ways. Examples include providing: 1) a fixed value reinforcer (e.g., DeFulio et al, 2021), where participants receive the same value incentive for each verified target behavior, 2) an escalating value of reinforcers across consecutive days in which participants meet treatment criteria (e.g., Dallery et al, 2013), or 3) an escalating value of reinforcers with a reset in value when patients lapse or relapse to drug use (e.g., Tidey et al, 2011). Several laboratory studies comparing these methods suggest that providing escalating reinforcers that reset in value upon a lapse or relapse (i.e., escalating and resetting schedule) is the most effective at reducing repeated drug choice; though a majority of these studies evaluated smoking cessation (Dallery & Raiff, 2007; Roll & Higgins, 2000; Roll & Shoptaw, 2006).…”
Section: Schedule Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%