2018
DOI: 10.2196/cardio.8802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphone Apps Using Photoplethysmography for Heart Rate Monitoring: Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundSmartphone ownership is rising at a stunning rate. Moreover, smartphones prove to be suitable for use in health care due to their availability, portability, user-friendliness, relatively low price, wireless connectivity, far-reaching computing capabilities, and comprehensive memory. To measure vital signs, smartphones are often connected to a mobile sensor or a medical device. However, by using the white light-emitting diode as light source and the phone camera as photodetector, a smartphone could be… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(167 reference statements)
2
31
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy is often limited by anatomical factors including location, movement, skin colour and conductivity. Fingertip PPG is highly accurate, with meta‐analysis demonstrating a mean difference of 0.32 beats per minute (99% CI, − 1.25 to 0.60) compared with ECG . Smartphones are the most commonly used device to feature PPG; however, wrist‐worn devices also exist, such as smart watches and heart rate tracking devices.…”
Section: Devicesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accuracy is often limited by anatomical factors including location, movement, skin colour and conductivity. Fingertip PPG is highly accurate, with meta‐analysis demonstrating a mean difference of 0.32 beats per minute (99% CI, − 1.25 to 0.60) compared with ECG . Smartphones are the most commonly used device to feature PPG; however, wrist‐worn devices also exist, such as smart watches and heart rate tracking devices.…”
Section: Devicesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Wearable technology is used in heart rate tracking, with high levels of accuracy in both smartphone and wrist‐based formats . Relevant clinical assessments are similar to conventional ambulatory ECG monitors and include measuring adequate rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF), and aiding the diagnosis of bradyarrhythmia or tachyarrhythmia.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the latest iteration of wearables now uses a hybrid system that prompts the user to acquire a single-lead ECG, when their HR deviates from a personalized R-R variability and physical activity template generated from their PPG data. These systems are likely to compete with conventional medical grade devices, given the ease with which biometric indices can be recorded [23].…”
Section: Monitoring Of Cardiac Function In the Era Of Wearable Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the poor measuring quality caused by low frame rates is generally considered a potential challenge to the validity of using the smartphone PPG method. However, researchers have proposed various methods to improve the accuracy rate at low frame rates [33], and empirical studies have also indicated that smartphone PPG results are comparable to those obtained using gold standard ECGs [21,28,[37][38][39][40]. There seems to be conflicting suggestions and conclusions in the literature, and therefore, more empirical evidence is required to clarify this issue.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%