2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ictss.2018.8550028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart Hybrid Learning Framework Based on Three-Layer Architecture to Bolster Up Education 4.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nichols et al (2016) and Giorgio and Brophy (2001)) were often described within the literature, flexible adaptation of CBL approaches was very common. For example, experiential learning, competency based learning and CBL (Garay-Rondero et al, 2019), research based learning and CBL (Morales-Menendez et al, 2019), CBL and design thinking (Gama, Alencar, et al, 2019;Gama, Castor, et al, 2019), CBL and competency based education (Félix-Herrán et al, 2019), CBL and challenge based instruction (Fidalgo-Blanco et al, 2016), design challenge based learning (DCBL) (Blevis, 2010), CBL and feedback (CFL) (Sternad, 2015), CBL, flipped classroom, and case based learning (Hartono, Kosala, Supangkat, & Ranti, 2018), CBL and agile practices (A. Santos, Sales, Fernandes, & Kroll, 2018), CBL and problem based learning (Barry et al, 2008) and CBL and game design thinking (Siqueira da Silva, 2018).…”
Section: Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nichols et al (2016) and Giorgio and Brophy (2001)) were often described within the literature, flexible adaptation of CBL approaches was very common. For example, experiential learning, competency based learning and CBL (Garay-Rondero et al, 2019), research based learning and CBL (Morales-Menendez et al, 2019), CBL and design thinking (Gama, Alencar, et al, 2019;Gama, Castor, et al, 2019), CBL and competency based education (Félix-Herrán et al, 2019), CBL and challenge based instruction (Fidalgo-Blanco et al, 2016), design challenge based learning (DCBL) (Blevis, 2010), CBL and feedback (CFL) (Sternad, 2015), CBL, flipped classroom, and case based learning (Hartono, Kosala, Supangkat, & Ranti, 2018), CBL and agile practices (A. Santos, Sales, Fernandes, & Kroll, 2018), CBL and problem based learning (Barry et al, 2008) and CBL and game design thinking (Siqueira da Silva, 2018).…”
Section: Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows students to decide what they want to learn, when, how, why, and where. In this way, students have the flexibility to be responsible for building their knowledge (Hartono et al, 2018). At the end of the study, the self-assessment questionnaire became interesting due to allowing the student to exercise his protagonism in its learning process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Education 4.0, the learning process is expected to be personalized. Students have the flexibility to be responsible for building their knowledge with the freedom to achieve their desired goals (Hartono et al, 2018). This new parameter redefines the education format, known as Education 4.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O conceito de Educação 4.0 surge com o propósito de preparar os estudantes para o mundo contemporâneo. Na Educação 4.0, espera-se que o processo de aprendizagem seja personalizado, no qual os estudantes tenham flexibilidade para serem os responsáveis pela construção do seu conhecimento com liberdade de atingir os seus objetivos [Hartono et al, 2018]. Além disso, busca-se uma mentalidade dinâmica para que os estudantes possam resolver problemas de forma colaborativa e criativa, criar soluções inovadoras e tecnológicas, e serem sujeitos ativos e responsáveis por sua aprendizagem.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified