Smart hospitality: Taiwan hotel stakeholder perspectives

Abstract

Purpose The term smartness has been discussed in the academia for many years; prior research has listed numerous advantages and encouraged business entities to implement smart technologies. However, stakeholders’ knowledge level, support intention and barriers to smart technology have been under investigated. Without the support of stakeholders, smart projects can hardly be implemented. This paper aims to explore the above-mentioned under investigated area and identify the gaps between academia and the hotel industry in Taiwan. Design/methodology/approach In-depth interviews were conducted with nine hotel stakeholders in Taiwan with investors, owners, managers, technology suppliers and information technology consultants. Three key areas were focused on: smart hotel definition, expectations from smart hotel and known barriers for implementing smart technologies. Findings The definition of smart hotel among all stakeholders was inconsistent. Stakeholders defined a smart hotel according to their role in the organization: revenue boost, service customization, operations effectiveness and in-room automation. However, the key functions of smart technologies, such as interconnectivity and interoperability with business partners’ application (e.g. online travel agencies) and linkage to external Big data for accurate revenue forecast, were not mentioned by the interviewees. In addition, social media monitoring, robots and artificial intelligence were not mentioned during the interview. Originality/value This study attempted to identify Taiwanese hotel stakeholders’ perspective on smart hotel and to compare the outcome with academic research. The result indicated that there is a big gap in the definition of “smart hotel” among stakeholders and academia and reflected several barriers that prohibit hotel owners and investors in implementing smart systems.

Residents’ Awareness and Aspiration for Smart Building Features: The Case of Okota, Lagos, Nigeria

“…Aside the fact that the study focused smart city and not specifically on smart building, the opinion of the users was not sought. The same argument can be said of Leung (2018) who investigated the hotel stakeholders' perspectives of smart technology with a view to identify gaps between academia and hotel industry in Taiwan. With a focus on definition, expectation and barriers to implementation of smart technology, the authors conducted interviews on investors, managers, owners, technology suppliers and IT consultants.…”

Systematic Review of Smart Tourism Research

“…Extant smart tourism research ranges from case study [9], conceptual paper [2], to methodology/ technology-driven research [10,11] and behavioral model building study [12]. Prior studies have established a comprehensive knowledge of smart tourism by taking the perspectives of tourists [13], industry practitioners [14], and destination governments [15]. The idea of smart tourism destinations was initially proposed by tourism scholars [16][17][18] and enriched by further elaborating the idea of a smart tourism ecosystem in connection with conceptualizations of smart technologies, smart cities and smart tourism [1].…”

“…For example, consensus regarding the definition of smart tourism, which is a prerequisite for theory development, appears not have been achieved [2], not to mention theoretical foundations developed specifically for the field. Additionally, practitioners do not seem to have a consistent understanding of what constitutes a smart property (e.g., smart hotel) [14]. Because of the rapid development of smart technologies and its applications, there is a need to perform an up-to-date review of the extant literature to provide a solid foundation and direction for future research.…”

Google Popular Times: towards a better understanding of tourist customer patronage behavior

“…In terms of further consumer behavior and tourism management implications, the study validates the view that the tool provides valuable information to industry stakeholders in multiple ways. First, Google Popular Times and Places generally overcomes the restrictions of recent information systems in tourism as described by Leung (2019) as it automatically integrates different data sources, aggregates the data, and is updated without any effort by the user. While customers as tourists may benefit from knowing whether crowdedness or quietness will be experienced at a certain restaurant at a particular time, tourism and restaurant managers can benefit from the research by not only enabling further optimization of service operations and business processes, but also by adopting this approach for comparisons with other restaurants or geographical places in support of benchmarking (Camp, 1995).…”