2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11961-8_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart Campus: Recent Advances and Future Challenges for Action Research on Territorial Sustainability

Abstract: The integration of technology for campus sustainability emerges as a new way forward to bridging the perceived gap between science and society. The perspective of carbon fossil resources depletion and the likely major impact of climate change fundamentally question the processes of energy production and consumption. Often termed "energy transition", their change requires an important sharing of knowledge to deal with the complexity and uncertainty of innovations. This chapter aims at addressing the green campu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The progress of a smart campus indicates similar progress in several sustainability indicators (Negreiros et al , 2020) which consequently leverages the achievement of the SDGs once a well-known relationship is found in the contribution of smart technologies to the construction of more sustainable university campuses (Némoz, 2015; Villegas-Ch et al , 2019; Kostepen et al , 2020; Adenle et al , 2021; Ceccarini et al , 2021). By contributing to lifelong learning practices (Mazutti et al , 2020) and collective learning (Némoz, 2015), campus safety (Ceccarini et al , 2021), energy efficiency (Negreiros et al , 2020), sustainable mobility (Torres-Sospedra et al , 2015) among others, smart practices on university campuses are closely connected to the SDGs as they are multidisciplinary and include many dimensions of campus life, especially regarding quality education (SDG 4), innovation and infrastructure (SDG 9) and sustainable cities (SDG 11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The progress of a smart campus indicates similar progress in several sustainability indicators (Negreiros et al , 2020) which consequently leverages the achievement of the SDGs once a well-known relationship is found in the contribution of smart technologies to the construction of more sustainable university campuses (Némoz, 2015; Villegas-Ch et al , 2019; Kostepen et al , 2020; Adenle et al , 2021; Ceccarini et al , 2021). By contributing to lifelong learning practices (Mazutti et al , 2020) and collective learning (Némoz, 2015), campus safety (Ceccarini et al , 2021), energy efficiency (Negreiros et al , 2020), sustainable mobility (Torres-Sospedra et al , 2015) among others, smart practices on university campuses are closely connected to the SDGs as they are multidisciplinary and include many dimensions of campus life, especially regarding quality education (SDG 4), innovation and infrastructure (SDG 9) and sustainable cities (SDG 11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Smart campus studies could pay attention to the effects of two highly dynamic components of a smart campus: changing stakeholder needs, and the advancement of smart technology (Hassanain et al ., 2022). This further calls for a socio-technical perspective (Némoz, 2015) in the study of smart campuses. The results also indicate that smart campus research is not exhaustive due to the above-mentioned stakeholders' need volatility and is a dynamic and progressive technology domain (Zhang et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these transitions are on-going, there is little evidence to show that the views of the users are being incorporated during the decision-making processes which govern its conceptualization, design, and implementation stages [23]. Scholars have observed the unidirectional nature of the Smart City implementation programs [24,25]. This is despite the need for Smart Campus projects to be mostly human-centered and user driven [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%