2016
DOI: 10.3390/land5030024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smallholders, Agrarian Reform, and Globalization in the Brazilian Amazon: Cattle versus the Environment

Abstract: Smallholder farming in the Brazilian Amazon has changed markedly over the last few decades, following a pervasive swing to cattle production observed across the basin. These changes have brought opportunities for accumulating a modicum of wealth that were not available in the early stages of colonization. At the same time, they have reconfigured livelihood systems away from diversified agriculture to a strong engagement with the cattle economy. They are also exposing smallholders to new forms of exploitation b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Large-scale meatpackers often deal with independent brokers who collect animals of unknown origin from a wide variety of anonymous suppliers. 67 Such shortcomings are likely moot, since an energetic continuation of private sector engagement in the conservation quest appears unlikely under an administration intent on exploiting the resource potential of Amazonia. 64 Therefore, it is disappointing that a sustainable and economically viable alternative to cattle ranching has not been found, despite local successes with community-based forestry management, the extraction of non-timber forest products, and ecotourism.…”
Section: A Trend Is Not a Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale meatpackers often deal with independent brokers who collect animals of unknown origin from a wide variety of anonymous suppliers. 67 Such shortcomings are likely moot, since an energetic continuation of private sector engagement in the conservation quest appears unlikely under an administration intent on exploiting the resource potential of Amazonia. 64 Therefore, it is disappointing that a sustainable and economically viable alternative to cattle ranching has not been found, despite local successes with community-based forestry management, the extraction of non-timber forest products, and ecotourism.…”
Section: A Trend Is Not a Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, however, the forces external to the smallholder or smallholder communities emanate from well beyond the urban hinterland, constituting teleconnections. Research that explicitly considers the impact of teleconnections on smallholder land use and livelihoods is key to better understanding broader LULCC processes and patterns, as suggested in this special feature (see [59,60]). With increasing calls for studies related to teleconnections in land systems and sustainability science [71,72], it is worth stressing the importance of smallholders in teleconnections research.…”
Section: The Place Of Smallholders In Teleconnections Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographer Ritaumaria Pereira and colleagues [59] explore how smallholder farming in the Brazilian Amazon has changed over time. Drawing on mixed-methods field research in southeastern Pará, Pereira and colleagues show how smallholders are influenced and exploited by transnational cattle corporations and global production networks.…”
Section: Dynamic Smallholder Livelihoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, companies sourcing wood products rarely exclusively source these from (producers involved in) natural forests and may also source wood from (producers of ) planted forests. In some places in Latin America, an increasing number of smallholders are engaged in commercial forms of animal husbandry, where significant sales occur through intermediaries working with large-scale ranchers (Pereira et al 2016). Nevertheless, in appraising our study's results, it must be acknowledged that the failure of committers to account for certain negative externalities may be more socially and/or environmentally detrimental in some sectors than in others.…”
Section: Fsc 'Natural Forest' Definition (Fsc 2015)mentioning
confidence: 88%