2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smallholder farmers' motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
86
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in terms of wealth status, a majority of SF were intermediate, while the majority of NSF was better-off. Similarly, Lalani et al (2016) found that poor farmers have highest intentions to use conservation agriculture. Similarly, SF have a smaller family size (5 persons) and relatively a lower available family labour for farming activities (4 persons) compared to the NSF.…”
Section: Farmer Socio-cultural Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in terms of wealth status, a majority of SF were intermediate, while the majority of NSF was better-off. Similarly, Lalani et al (2016) found that poor farmers have highest intentions to use conservation agriculture. Similarly, SF have a smaller family size (5 persons) and relatively a lower available family labour for farming activities (4 persons) compared to the NSF.…”
Section: Farmer Socio-cultural Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research that delves deeper into the pathways between beliefs and pro-environmental practices among farmers, including studies utilizing the expectancy-value model [18], the theory of planned behaviour [19], and the Values-Beliefs-Norms theory [20], confirm a more complex picture of farmer decision making [21][22][23]. One overarching implication of this research is that, counter to many popular preconceptions, not all or even many farmers are purely rational utility maximizers [24][25][26].…”
Section: Climate Change and Farmer Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, in terms of wealth status, a majority of SF were intermediate, while the majority of NSF was better-off. Similarly, Lalani et al (2016) found that poor farmers have highest intentions to use conservation agriculture. Similarly, SF have a smaller family size (5 persons) and relatively a lower available family labor for farming activities (4 persons) compared to the NSF.…”
Section: Farmer Socio-cultural Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%