The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
20th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS' 05)
DOI: 10.1109/lics.2005.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Substructures and Decidability Issues for First-Order Logic with Two Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
44
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not imply anything on the decidability of FO 2 (∼, +1), since the equivalence relation and the two tree successor relations cannot be axiomatized in FO 2 . A recent paper generalized the result of [19] in the presence of one or two equivalence relations [16]. Again this does not apply to our context as we also have two successor relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This does not imply anything on the decidability of FO 2 (∼, +1), since the equivalence relation and the two tree successor relations cannot be axiomatized in FO 2 . A recent paper generalized the result of [19] in the presence of one or two equivalence relations [16]. Again this does not apply to our context as we also have two successor relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Again this does not apply to our context as we also have two successor relations. However [16] also showed that the twovariable fragment of FO with three equivalence relations, without any other structure, is undecidable. This implies that FO 2 (∼1, ∼2, ∼3, +1) is undecidable and that manipulating more than two different attributes at the same time quickly leads to undecidability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [10] that EQ 2 1 also has the finite model property, with satisfiability again NEXPTIME-complete. However, the same paper showed that the finite model property fails for EQ 2 2 , and that its satisfiability problem is in 3-NEXPTIME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best currently known corresponding lower bound for these problems is 2-EXPTIME hard, obtained from the less expressive two-variable guarded fragment with equivalence relations [8]. It was further shown in [10] that the satisfiability and finite satisfiability problems for EQ 2 3 are undecidable. In this paper, we show: (i) EC 2 1 retains the finite model property, and its satisfiability problem remains in NEXPTIME; (ii) the satisfiability and finite satisfiability problems for EC 2 2 are both in 2-NEXPTIME; (iii) the satisfiability and finite satisfiability problems for EQ 2 2 are both 2-NEXPTIME-hard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation