2018
DOI: 10.1002/malq.201700055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite satisfiability for two‐variable, first‐order logic with one transitive relation is decidable

Abstract: We consider two-variable, first-order logic in which a single distinguished predicate is required to be interpreted as a transitive relation. We show that the finite satisfiability problem for this logic is decidable in triply exponential non-deterministic time. Complexity falls to doubly exponential non-deterministic time if the transitive relation is constrained to be a partial order.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to space limits the proof is given in Section A.2. The following lemma employs a technique from [13] to eliminate binary predicates.…”
Section: Proof a Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to space limits the proof is given in Section A.2. The following lemma employs a technique from [13] to eliminate binary predicates.…”
Section: Proof a Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For equivalence, everything is known: the (finite) satisfiability problem for FO 2 in the presence of a single equivalence relation remains NExpTime-complete, but this increases to 2-NExpTime-complete in the presence of two equivalence relations [7,8], and becomes undecidable with three. For transitivity, we have an incomplete picture: the finite satisfiability problem for FO 2 in the presence with a single transitive relation in decidable in 3-NExpTime [14], while the decidability of the satisfiability problem remains open (cf. [24]); the corresponding problems with two transitive relations are both undecidable [9].Adding equivalence relations to the fluted fragment poses no new problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 5.13 (Adaption of Lemma 4.2 in [Pra18]). If a class K of structures allows cloning then for all ϕ ∈ FO 2 (K) one can effectively find formulas (ϕ C ) C∈C , for some finite set C, in spread normal form such that the following conditions are equivalent:…”
Section: Decision Procedures For a Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular interest has been in deciding the satisfiability problem for such extensions. Recently a decision procedure for the finite satisfiability problem for ESO 2 with one transitive relation and for ESO 2 with one partial order have been obtained [Pra18]. Previously ESO 2 with two equivalence relations [KO12,KT09] and ESO 2 with two "forest" relations have been shown to be decidable [CW13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For equivalence, everything is known: the (finite) satisfiability problem for FO 2 in the presence of a single equivalence relation remains NExp-Time-complete, but this increases to 2-NExpTime-complete in the presence of two equivalence relations [9,10], and becomes undecidable with three. For transitivity, we have an incomplete picture: the finite satisfiability problem for FO 2 in the presence with a single transitive relation is decidable in 3-NExpTime [16], while the decidability of the satisfiability problem remains open (cf. [26]); the corresponding problems with two transitive relations are both undecidable [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%