2018
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201813477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small‐scale dynamos in simulations of stratified turbulent convection

Abstract: Small-scale dynamo action is often held responsible for the generation of quiet Sun magnetic fields. We aim to determine the excitation conditions and saturation level of small-scale dynamos in nonrotating turbulent convection at low magnetic Prandtl numbers. We use high-resolution direct numerical simulations of weakly stratified turbulent convection. We find that the critical magnetic Reynolds number for dynamo excitation increases as the magnetic Prandtl number is decreased, which might suggest that small-s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schekochihin et al. 2007; Käpylä, Käpylä & Brandenburg 2018).
Figure 1.Estimated values of the critical magnetic Reynolds number and the critical Rayleigh number for the onset of dynamo action.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Schekochihin et al. 2007; Käpylä, Käpylä & Brandenburg 2018).
Figure 1.Estimated values of the critical magnetic Reynolds number and the critical Rayleigh number for the onset of dynamo action.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2012) and Käpylä et al. (2018) showed that dynamo action can be excited at a smaller value of with the use of a larger aspect ratio. Käpylä et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Iskakov et al (2007) found supercritical solutions near PrM ≈ 0.1 when using hyperviscosity in their simulations, which does however affect the strength of the spectral bottleneck, as will be discussed in a moment. Even the re-cent convection simulations of Käpylä et al (2018) at a resolution of 1024 3 meshpoints found only decaying magnetic fields at PrM = 0.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This explained by the higher magnetic Prandtl number (Pm = 2) in comparison to the present study (Pm = 0.5). This also explains why a small-scale dynamo is excited in run 2a of Dobler et al (2006) with Re M = 93, while it is absent in the current run MHD0 with an almost identical magnetic Reynolds number (Re M = 95) (see e.g., Schekochihin et al 2007;Käpylä et al 2018).…”
Section: Appendix A: Comparison To Dobler Et Al (2006)mentioning
confidence: 77%