2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star-in-a-box simulations of fully convective stars

Abstract: Context. Main-sequence late-type stars with masses of less than 0.35 M⊙ are fully convective. Aims. The goal is to study convection, differential rotation, and dynamos as functions of rotation in fully convective stars. Methods. Three-dimensional hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic numerical simulations with a star-in-a-box model, in which a spherical star is immersed inside of a Cartesian cube, are used. The model corresponds to a 0.2 M⊙ main-sequence M5 dwarf. A range of rotation periods (Prot) between 4.3 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fan & Fang (2014), Guerrero et al (2016), and Käpylä et al (2017) demonstrate that solar-like large-scale magnetic fields can be produced entirely within a convection zone without extending the simulation down to the tachocline. Käpylä (2021) shows the similarity of large-scale field generation between partially and fully convective stars. Progress in MHD simulations provides an impetus to rethink the roles of the tachocline in the BL-type dynamo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Fan & Fang (2014), Guerrero et al (2016), and Käpylä et al (2017) demonstrate that solar-like large-scale magnetic fields can be produced entirely within a convection zone without extending the simulation down to the tachocline. Käpylä (2021) shows the similarity of large-scale field generation between partially and fully convective stars. Progress in MHD simulations provides an impetus to rethink the roles of the tachocline in the BL-type dynamo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The star-in-a-box model described in Käpylä (2021) is used; see also Dobler et al (2006). A star of radius R is embedded into a Cartesian cube with side length H = 2.2R.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setup of the simulations is otherwise identical to those in Käpylä (2021) except that the amplitude of the radiative conductivity K 0 is enhanced such that in the thermodynamically saturated state, the star has a radiative core (CZ) that encompasses roughly two-thirds (one-third) of the stellar radius. Furthermore, the diffusion coefficients η, ν, and χ SGS have radial profiles such that their values in the radiative core are 10 2 smaller than in the CZ to avoid diffusive spreading of magnetic fields and flows into the core.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The star-in-a-box model described in Käpylä (2021) is used; see also Dobler et al (2006). A star of radius R is embedded into a Cartesian cube with a side length H = 2.2R.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set-up of the simulations is otherwise identical to those in Käpylä (2021) except that the amplitude of the radiative conductivity K 0 is enhanced such that in the thermodynamically saturated state the star has a radiative core (CZ) that encompasses roughly two thirds (one third) of stellar radius. Furthermore, the diffusion coefficients η, ν, and χ SGS have radial profiles such Table 1.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%