Small groups, contexts, and civic engagement: A multilevel analysis of United States Congregational Life Survey data

Abstract

Prior research suggests that church-goers are more civically engaged than their non-church-going counterparts. Little is known, however, about how the popular phenomenon of small groups factors into this equation. In the present study, we examine relationships between small group participation at individual and congregation levels and civic engagement. Using multilevel modeling and national data on congregations and individuals from the U.S. Congregational Life Study (n=82,044), we find that: (1) individual-level small group involvement is associated with four measures of civic engagement; (2) congregation-level small group participation is associated with both lower and higher civic engagement in the case of two outcomes; and (3) in the case of three civic outcomes, congregation-level small group participation moderates individual-level small group involvement such that small group members' civic activity more closely resembles the lower civic engagement of small group nonparticipants. In the case of one civic outcome, at high levels of overall small group participation, small group members' civic engagement drops below that of small group nonparticipants. Explanations for these findings, including a "crowding out" effect, are examined including their complex implications for debates regarding small groups, religious involvement, and civic engagement.

Religious Engagement, Civic Skills, and Political Participation in Latin America

“…As these writings point out, civic skills can be developed through regular church attendance, but they are predominantly acquired through participation in small group activities outside of normal worship services (e.g., Djupe and Gilbert ; Verba, Schlozman, and Brady ; Whitehead and Strope ). The more participatory nature of these groups allows adherents to pick up skills that they can then translate into political engagement.…”

“…For example, Schwadel (2002) finds that economic inequality persists in civic participation and skill development within the church, as those with lower incomes are less likely to take part in the ancillary activities of the church. Furthermore, others have found gender, education, and religiosity to influence whether one takes on important leadership roles within the church (e.g., Djupe and Gilbert 2006;Whitehead and Stroope 2015). Yet, churches are not merely reinforcing political inequality; the development of civic skills is also often heralded as an equalizing force when it comes to political engagement and representation (Lichterman and Potts 2008;Smith 2017;Smidt et al 2008;Verba, Schlozman, and Brady 1995).…”

Dunbar’s Number goes to Church: The Social Brain Hypothesis as a third strand in the study of church growth

“…Belonging to small groups attached to a larger congregation, however, plays a fundamental role in the civic engagement of its members. Whitehead and Stroope’s (2015) analysis of data, drawn from over 80,000 individuals in 424 congregations, indicates that individuals who are members of church-based small groups are more likely to report high civic engagement. But the motive for promoting small groups makes a difference.…”

Pembinaan Moral Anak-Anak melalui Sekolah Minggu di Gereja Santo Andreas Tidar Malang

“…Dari sekian banyak penelitian tentang keterlibatan warga negara, terdapat penelitian tentang keterlibatan gereja melalui komunitas-kominitas kecil yang terjadi di dalam masyarakat (Whitehead & Stroope, 2015). Selain itu terdapat keterlibatan warga negara dalam pembinaan nilai dan moral pada masyarakat multi-etnis (Piang, Banu, Naidu, & Osman, 2017), keterlibatan warga negara dalam penguatan karakter (Gusmadi, 2018), serta pembinaan moral yang dilakukan dalam lingkup pendidikan disekolah (Wadu & Jaisa, 2017).…”