2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small electron acceleration episodes in the solar corona

Abstract: We study the energetics of nonthermal electrons produced in small acceleration episodes in the solar corona. We carried out an extensive survey spanning 2004-2015 and shortlisted 6 impulsive electron events detected at 1 AU that were not associated with large solar flares(GOES soft x-ray class > C1) or with coronal mass ejections. Each of these events had weak, but detectable hard Xray (HXR) emission near the west limb, and were associated with interplanetary type III bursts. In some respects, these events see… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(58 reference statements)
4
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the energy contained in the deca-keV elec-trons increases, the corresponding radio brightness temperature increases. The energies obtained are quite small, in comparison to those measured at 1 AU (Krucker et al 2007;James et al 2017). However the durations of our electrons beams are significantly lower than those estimated at 1AU, with the number of electrons per second of our largest simulations being comparable to James et al (2017) at 74 keV.…”
Section: Frequency Log Amplitude Spectralcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…As the energy contained in the deca-keV elec-trons increases, the corresponding radio brightness temperature increases. The energies obtained are quite small, in comparison to those measured at 1 AU (Krucker et al 2007;James et al 2017). However the durations of our electrons beams are significantly lower than those estimated at 1AU, with the number of electrons per second of our largest simulations being comparable to James et al (2017) at 74 keV.…”
Section: Frequency Log Amplitude Spectralcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…in the case of less pitch-angle scattering, an effect that can reduce the determined number of escaping electrons, the anisotropic sample does indeed contain on average higher numbers of escaping in situ electrons. In contrast to results by James et al (2017), who used data by ACE/EPAM (Gold et al 1998) and determined a fraction of 6 to 148% of escaping electrons compared to the HXRproducing electrons our results confirm the findings by Krucker et al (2007). We find very small fractions of escaping electrons with mean ratios of only 0.18% for all events and 0.24% for the anisotropic events.…”
Section: Total Number Of Escaping Electronssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similarly, the energy density in the nonthermal electron population per burst is only ≈ 10 −7 -10 −3 times that in the thermal population. This may be contrasted with the"cold" small acceleration events studied by James et al (2017), where the lack of soft Xray emission associated with their events implies that the acceleration process produced mostly nonthermal electrons (and very few thermal ones). We find that the power expended in accelerating the electrons responsible for a representative noise storm burst ranges from 10 21 to 10 24 erg s −1 and the energy contained in the accelerated electrons that produced a representative burst ranges from 10 20 to 10 23 erg (table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%