2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetics of small electron acceleration episodes in the solar corona from radio noise storm observations

Abstract: Observations of radio noise storms can act as sensitive probes of nonthermal electrons produced in small acceleration events in the solar corona. We use data from noise storm episodes observed jointly by the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) and the Nancay Radioheliograph (NRH) to study characteristics of the nonthermal electrons involved in the emission. We find that the electrons carry 10 21 to 10 24 erg/s, and that the energy contained in the electrons producing a representative noise storm burst range… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming Ω = 0.15 steradians (Steinberg et al 1974), τ ≈ 3 at 80 MHz (Ramesh 2005b), and an efficiency (η) of ≈10 −10 for the type I burst emission process (Subramanian & Becker 2004), we find E ≈ 8.1×10 22 erg. This is consistent with the reports that ∼10 21 -10 23 ergs are needed for a single type I burst (James & Subramanian 2018). We also calculated the energy using the relation E = n th (n/n th )VE m (see for e.g.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Assuming Ω = 0.15 steradians (Steinberg et al 1974), τ ≈ 3 at 80 MHz (Ramesh 2005b), and an efficiency (η) of ≈10 −10 for the type I burst emission process (Subramanian & Becker 2004), we find E ≈ 8.1×10 22 erg. This is consistent with the reports that ∼10 21 -10 23 ergs are needed for a single type I burst (James & Subramanian 2018). We also calculated the energy using the relation E = n th (n/n th )VE m (see for e.g.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The remaining 150 type III bursts were not associated with any flare. These 150 bursts were probably due to weak energy releases in the solar atmosphere reported earlier in the literature (for example, Ramesh et al (2010Ramesh et al ( , 2013; Saint-Hilaire, Vilmer, and Kerdraon (2013); Sasikumar Raja and Ramesh (2013b); Mugundhan, Hariharan, and Ramesh (2017); James, Subramanian, and Kontar (2017); James and Subramanian (2018); Sharma, Oberoi, and Arjunwadkar (2018)). We also find that 75% of the type III bursts in our list were observed below 200 MHz (left panel of Figure 5).…”
Section: Preliminary Analysis Of Type III Burstsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The presence of nonthermal particles in nanoflares is (so far) the most plausible explanation for the emission observed directly and indirectly in other wavelengths. These observations include (a) short-lived UV brightenings observed with the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) at loop footpoints in nonflaring active regions (e.g., Testa et al 2014Testa et al , 2020, (b) nonthermal radio emission from the quiescent corona (e.g., James & Subramanian 2018;Mondal et al 2020), and (c) multi-wavelength evidence of non-Maxwellian distributions and non-equilibrium ionization in the quiet transition region, corona, and solar wind (e.g., Dudík et al 2017b,a). Nanoflare observations in HXRs can complement our current understanding of the role of nonthermal particle processes in heating the quiescent corona.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%