1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00393278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small business and job creation: Dissecting the myth and reassessing the facts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
315
5
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 426 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
315
5
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Davis et al (1996), for example, find that small firms constitute the vast majority of businesses, but they are only of limited importance with regard to overall employment. Contrary, a number of empirical contributions provide evidence that jobs are mainly created by small firms (see, e.g., Broersma and Gautier 1997, Davidsson et al 1998and Picot and Dupuy 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davis et al (1996), for example, find that small firms constitute the vast majority of businesses, but they are only of limited importance with regard to overall employment. Contrary, a number of empirical contributions provide evidence that jobs are mainly created by small firms (see, e.g., Broersma and Gautier 1997, Davidsson et al 1998and Picot and Dupuy 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birch (1987) thus found that firms with less than 20 employees account for 88% of overall US employment growth. Davis et al (1996aDavis et al ( , 1996b later argued that Birch's findings had an upward bias in the contribution from small firms. Presenting a method without this problem, Davis et al (1996b) found that plants with an average size less than 100 employees accounted for about one third of gross job creation in US manufacturing over the period [1973][1974][1975][1976][1977][1978][1979][1980][1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987][1988].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davis et al (1996aDavis et al ( , 1996b later argued that Birch's findings had an upward bias in the contribution from small firms. Presenting a method without this problem, Davis et al (1996b) found that plants with an average size less than 100 employees accounted for about one third of gross job creation in US manufacturing over the period [1973][1974][1975][1976][1977][1978][1979][1980][1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987][1988]. Using the method developed by Davis et al, Neumark et al (2008) studied the overall economy and found that plants with an average size of less than 100 employees accounted for 70% of gross job creation in the period 1992-2002, while plants with less than 20 employees in themselves accounted for almost 50%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• and constitutes the main drive behind the creation of jobs (Caree and Klomp, 1996;Davis et al, 1996). They are one of the main vehicles for the creation and dissemination • of innovation, especially when entrepreneurs show a strong propensity for entrepreneurship and are able to transfer their entrepreneurial culture into their businesses, specifically in those sectors characterised by knowledge-intensive and high-added-value productions such as computing or biotechnology 6 (Edwards et al, 2005;Massa, 2008;Vrande et al, 2008;Love and Roper, 2013).…”
Section: The Importance Of the Smes In The European Economymentioning
confidence: 99%