2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icif.2006.301753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small bottom object density analysis from side scan sonar data by a mathematical morphology detector

Abstract: This paper describes a system for estimating the local density of small objects on the sea floor by exploiting a robust, non-parametric detector for high resolution images acquired by side scan sonar sensors. Low grazing angle target images are characterised by an area of strong intensity, the highlight, close to an area, the shadow, at the sensor noise level. The detector makes use of mathematical morphology to detect the highlight and the shadow areas within the image, and a fusion scheme to reduce the false… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preprocessing of the received data includes baseband conversion, complex matched filtering and normalization for the bistatic range sum (BRS = R tx + R rx , estimated from the echo time of arrival at the receiver) profile attenuation. The attenuation profile has been estimated from the data by using a set of mathematical morphology filters as in [45] and [46]. Figure 13 shows the average power of the array elements after the normalization for the attenuation profile at scan time T 1 .…”
Section: Testing On Real Sonar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preprocessing of the received data includes baseband conversion, complex matched filtering and normalization for the bistatic range sum (BRS = R tx + R rx , estimated from the echo time of arrival at the receiver) profile attenuation. The attenuation profile has been estimated from the data by using a set of mathematical morphology filters as in [45] and [46]. Figure 13 shows the average power of the array elements after the normalization for the attenuation profile at scan time T 1 .…”
Section: Testing On Real Sonar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preprocessing of the received data includes baseband conversion, complex matched filtering and normalization for the bistatic range sum (BRS = R tx + R rx , estimated from the echo time of arrival at the receiver) profile attenuation. The attenuation profile has been estimated from the data by using a set of mathematical morphology filters as in [45] and [46]. Figure 13 shows the average power of the array elements after the normalization for the attenuation profile at scan time T 1 .…”
Section: Testing On Real Sonar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the building blocks of the system. A comprehensive introduction to mathematical morphology tools is provided in [3] while a detailed description of the morphological detection algorithm can be found in [5]. An introduction to the state of the art of ship detection algorithms for SAR data is provided in [6].…”
Section: Detection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%