2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2014.6854009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single snapshot DOA estimation using compressed sensing

Abstract: This paper deals with the problem of estimating the directions of arrival (DOA) of multiple source signals from a single observation vector of an array data. In particular, four estimation algorithms based on the theory of compressed sensing (CS), i.e., the classical ℓ 1 minimization (or Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, LASSO), the fast smooth ℓ 0 minimization, and the Sparse Iterative Covariance-Based Estimator, SPICE and the Iterative Adaptive Approach for Amplitude and Phase Estimation, IAA-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The easiest way to exploit this, known as Digital Beam Forming (DBF), applies a Fourier transform to translate the time delay of received signals at each antenna into a phase shift, which is proportional to the angle of arrival of the signal. There are more advanced algorithms such as MVDR [15], MIMO-Monopulse [16], subspace methods such as MUSIC [17] or ESPRIT [18], or methods based on compressive sensing [19], [20], [21]. However, these methods usually require higher computational costs and longer integration times; hence, they are not always easily applicable in automotive scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The easiest way to exploit this, known as Digital Beam Forming (DBF), applies a Fourier transform to translate the time delay of received signals at each antenna into a phase shift, which is proportional to the angle of arrival of the signal. There are more advanced algorithms such as MVDR [15], MIMO-Monopulse [16], subspace methods such as MUSIC [17] or ESPRIT [18], or methods based on compressive sensing [19], [20], [21]. However, these methods usually require higher computational costs and longer integration times; hence, they are not always easily applicable in automotive scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also these methods suffer from high computational complexity. However, in hostile conditions, due to physical constraints, less number of snapshots or only one snapshot may be accessible for DOA estimation [17,18]. All adaptive algorithms, which depend on an estimation of noise covariance matrix, will fail for single snapshot instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the DOA estimation with short snapshots is receiving more and more attention and many literature devote to it [1]. More recently, DOA estimation based on CS (CS-DOA) becomes a hot field because of its advantage in fully exploiting the inherent sparseness of the DOA [2] and reducing the observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%