1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.368385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow photoconductivity decay in 3C-SiC on Si substrates

Abstract: N-type 3C-SiC layers grown on p-type (001) Si substrates were characterized by the conventional photoconductivity decay method. A N2 laser (337 nm wavelength) was used as the excitation source. A very slow component with a time constant larger than 1 ms was observed in the photoconductivity decay curves. A numerical simulation considering a trap with a very small capture cross section for electrons (<1×10−21 cm2) was able to reproduce main qualitative features of the experimental results. From compariso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unique phenomenon of the long relaxation of photoconductance after removing illumination observed in many semiconductor crystals (GaN, 1,2 SiC, 3 ZnO, 4,5 SnO 2 , 6 Bi 2 S 3 , 7 WO 3 , 8 ), known by the term persistent photoconductivity (PPC), has stimulated the profound interest of researchers. Many investigations have been carried out to clarify the origin of the phenomenon of persistent photoconductivity, with the following hypotheses being predominant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique phenomenon of the long relaxation of photoconductance after removing illumination observed in many semiconductor crystals (GaN, 1,2 SiC, 3 ZnO, 4,5 SnO 2 , 6 Bi 2 S 3 , 7 WO 3 , 8 ), known by the term persistent photoconductivity (PPC), has stimulated the profound interest of researchers. Many investigations have been carried out to clarify the origin of the phenomenon of persistent photoconductivity, with the following hypotheses being predominant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second relatively slow decay component might be due to trapping-detrapping effects via shallow levels, as has been reported previously. 7,15) Another possible explanation is that the first decay component is dominated by Auger recombination and the second decay is the actual Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) recombination. Neglecting radiative recombination, the measured lifetime eff can be expressed as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first decay therefore probably results from Shockley-Read-Hall recombination. The second slow decay component is thought to be due to long-lived excess carriers through trapping-detrapping effects via shallow levels [20]. Since the second slow decay is 6 notably seen in the decay curve obtained from the poly-Si after HPWVA, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results a D Discussiomentioning
confidence: 92%