1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-7516(98)00041-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slippage of water over hydrophobic surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
292
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
292
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For strong liquid-wall interaction the contact angle is low (Q < 908) or the liquid even wets the solid completely (Q = 0). Computer simulations [1016][1017][1018][1019][1020] and experiments confirmed that for low fluid-wall interactions slippage occurs [1009,1021,1022].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For strong liquid-wall interaction the contact angle is low (Q < 908) or the liquid even wets the solid completely (Q = 0). Computer simulations [1016][1017][1018][1019][1020] and experiments confirmed that for low fluid-wall interactions slippage occurs [1009,1021,1022].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…[1029,1030]). It is now generally accepted that slip occurs for liquids on lyophobic surfaces, for example for water on hydrophobic surfaces [1009]. This is a result of a number of experiments with the AFM and other techniques.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first assumption is that the basic flow in the gas layer essentially shows the same behaviour as the flow in the liquid layer. This means in the Couette flow case that a flow with a constant (albeit higher) shear rate develops in the gas layer (Vinogradova 1999). In the pressure-driven cases it would be assumed (as in the case of PCAF Joseph et al 1997) that the same mean streamwise pressure gradient Π acts as in the liquid layer, Π G = Π L .…”
Section: Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption that the gas on a superhydrophobic surface is trapped, i.e. zero net mass flow downstream, leads to different results for change in drag, the optimum air layer thickness and apparent slip length compared to h h R Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas previous approaches (Joseph, Nguyen & Beavers 1984;Than, Rosso & Joseph 1987;Vinogradova 1999) where a finite mass flow rate is allowed in the air layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%