2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slippage and migration in Taylor–Couette flow of a model for dilute wormlike micellar solutions

Abstract: We explore the rheological predictions of a constitutive model developed for dilute or semi-dilute wormlike micellar solutions in an axisymmetric Taylor-Couette flow. This study is a natural continuation of earlier work on rectilinear shear flows. The model, based on a bead-spring microstructure with nonaffine motion, reproduces the pronounced plateau in the stress strain-rate flow curve that is observed in laboratory measurements of steady shearing flows. We also carry out a linear stability analysis of the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter class of models it is necessary to solve the coupled differential equations for stress and conservation of momentum in order to determine the local velocity field and the resulting apparent flow curve. In the present paper we compare our results with those predicted by the Johnson-Segalman model [23], which has been extensively studied in inhomogeneous steady shear flows [22,[24][25][26][27]. Although motivated by physical processes such as non-affine chain deformation, the Johnson-Segalman (JS) class of models cannot be connected directly to microstructural features of the flow such as the breaking and reforming processes important in shear-banding transitions of wormlike micellar solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the latter class of models it is necessary to solve the coupled differential equations for stress and conservation of momentum in order to determine the local velocity field and the resulting apparent flow curve. In the present paper we compare our results with those predicted by the Johnson-Segalman model [23], which has been extensively studied in inhomogeneous steady shear flows [22,[24][25][26][27]. Although motivated by physical processes such as non-affine chain deformation, the Johnson-Segalman (JS) class of models cannot be connected directly to microstructural features of the flow such as the breaking and reforming processes important in shear-banding transitions of wormlike micellar solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In [34] Dirichlet conditions were imposed resulting in boundary layers at the walls. Alternate Neumann boundary conditions are considered in [24]. For further discussion on the variations in the rheological predications as the model parameters are varied see [30].…”
Section: Governing Equations For the Two Species Scission Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model is derived by starting with the basic equations in a solution of non-interacting dumbbells for the number density and polymeric stress, that are already available in the polymeric uids literature (Beris & Mavrantzas 1994;Bhave et al 1991;Cook & Rossi 2004;Rossi et al 2006). As a consequence, these basic equations are simply written down in Section 2.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%