2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.06.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip transmission of high angle grain boundaries in body-centered cubic metals: Micropillar compression of pure Ta single and bi-crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the example shown in these figures, it appears that the slip plane corresponding to the slip trace marked by the red solid line is ð1010Þ. A number of previous studies applied the Euler angle or the angle between the c axis of the hexagonal crystal and the loading direction to evaluate the Schmid factor (Weaver et al, 2018;Nan et al, 2012). Here, however, we use a simple convenient method to evaluate the Schmid factor based on the software for orientation imaging microscopy (OIM), in which the Schmid factor is calculated by resolving the stress tensor to a set of principal stresses along with their directions.…”
Section: Slip Trace Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the example shown in these figures, it appears that the slip plane corresponding to the slip trace marked by the red solid line is ð1010Þ. A number of previous studies applied the Euler angle or the angle between the c axis of the hexagonal crystal and the loading direction to evaluate the Schmid factor (Weaver et al, 2018;Nan et al, 2012). Here, however, we use a simple convenient method to evaluate the Schmid factor based on the software for orientation imaging microscopy (OIM), in which the Schmid factor is calculated by resolving the stress tensor to a set of principal stresses along with their directions.…”
Section: Slip Trace Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 4 , we could see images of micro-pillars with different taper angles after compression in a load-controlled regime. The plastic flow in case of micro-pillars with smaller taper angles (≤7°) was localized in the form of small-scale shear bands that were similar to those observed in the sample MoBC AM ; however, in this case, the coating was composed of nanosized grains, and, thus, the shearing could be explained by grain boundary sliding mechanism that is typical for polycrystalline metallic micro-pillars [ 21 , 22 ]. On the other hand, for higher taper angles in the range between 7° and 12°, the excessive stress concentrations close to the top of micro-pillars resulted in a higher probability of large-scale localized specimen failure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Figure 3 b shows an image of the corresponding micro-pillar after deformation with the flat punch indenter. We could see that the deformation led to the formation of several shear bands close to the top of the pillar resembling slip traces caused by grain boundary sliding in metals [ 21 , 22 ], albeit, in this case, the coatings posed amorphous microstructure. The sliding mechanism could be explained by the movement of the so-called Somigliana dislocations observed in metallic glasses [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively large deviation of measured stress corresponds well to the previous results for bcc metals measured by micropillar compression tests. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] It is noteworthy that a trend can be observed that σ i becomes higher at higher  ε i ( Fig. 6(a)), which is indicative of strain-rate sensitive stress required for the slip initiation in micronscale single-crystals with a dimeter of 2-3 μm.…”
Section: Compression Tests For Single-crystal Micropillarsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, there are a few reports on micropillar compression tests applied for ferrous materials, [18][19][20][21] regardless of various reports on single-crystal micropillars of pure bcc metals (Cr, Nb, W and Ta). [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] In micro-mechanical testing, size-dependent strength of microscale specimens (smaller is stronger) is generally known in bcc pure metals. 22,27) However, the strength of ferrous materials measured by micro-mechanical testing has been scarcely reported.…”
Section: Strain Rate Sensitivity Of Flow Stress Measured By Micropillmentioning
confidence: 99%