2003
DOI: 10.1029/2002jb001976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip distribution of the 1952 Tokachi‐Oki earthquake (M 8.1) along the Kuril Trench deduced from tsunami waveform inversion

Abstract: [1] We inverted 13 tsunami waveforms recorded in Japan to estimate the slip distribution of the 1952 Tokachi-Oki earthquake (M 8.1), which occurred southeast off Hokkaido along the southern Kuril subduction zone. The previously estimated source area determined from tsunami travel times [Hatori, 1973] did not coincide with the observed aftershock distribution. Our results show that a large amount of slip occurred in the aftershock area east of Hatori's tsunami source area, suggesting that a portion of the inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The epicenter is located in the same region where the earlier 1952 Tokachi-Oki earthquake M w =8.1 occurred Hirata et al, 2003). Figure 1 shows a map of the epicentral region with the plate boundaries and major fault lines, as well as the location of the epicenters of earthquakes that occurred within six months after the main earthquake of 25 September 2003.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epicenter is located in the same region where the earlier 1952 Tokachi-Oki earthquake M w =8.1 occurred Hirata et al, 2003). Figure 1 shows a map of the epicentral region with the plate boundaries and major fault lines, as well as the location of the epicenters of earthquakes that occurred within six months after the main earthquake of 25 September 2003.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the afterslip area of the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquakes could be also included in the coseismic area of the 1952 Tokachi-oki earthquake (e.g., Hirata et al 2003). The spatial resolution of the slip distribution of the 1952 earthquake would be lower than that of the 2003 sequence, which implies that the frictional properties in the region might exhibit significant temporal change.…”
Section: Source Area Of the 2003 Tokachi-oki Earthquakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies can be broadly divided into two categories: with a priori assumptions on the fault model (e.g. Satake, 1987Satake, , 1993Hirata et al, 2003;Titov et al, 2005), and without a priori assumptions on the source, namely , Satake et al (2005), Tsushima et al (2009), Wu andHo (2011) and Yasuda and Mase (2012).…”
Section: Inversion Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these events are those that occurred on 25 November 1941 (Udias et al, 1976;Lynnes and Ruff, 1985), 9 June 1969 (Argus et al, 1989), 26 May 1975(Buforn et al, 1998Argus et al, 1989;Kaabouben et al, 2008) and 17 October 1983 (Argus et al, 1989). Some of these earthquakes generated tsunamis, described in historical documents and recorded by tide stations, namely on 31 March 1761, 25 November 1941and 26 May 1975(Baptista et al, 2006Kaabouben et al, 2008;Baptista and Miranda, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%