2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding wear behaviour of conventional and nanostructured HVOF sprayed WC–Co coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
92
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
92
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…During spraying of WC-Co powders, significant changes in the chemical and phase compositions can occur [1]. The past two decades have seen extensive research in optimizing the feedstock powder characteristics, process parameters and post-treatments of wear-resistant hardmetal coatings [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Most research, however, has related to the coatings sprayed from agglomerated and sintered powders, with the typical particle size ranging from 10 to 50 lm and WC grain size ranging from 0.8 to 3.5 lm [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During spraying of WC-Co powders, significant changes in the chemical and phase compositions can occur [1]. The past two decades have seen extensive research in optimizing the feedstock powder characteristics, process parameters and post-treatments of wear-resistant hardmetal coatings [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Most research, however, has related to the coatings sprayed from agglomerated and sintered powders, with the typical particle size ranging from 10 to 50 lm and WC grain size ranging from 0.8 to 3.5 lm [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past two decades have seen extensive research in optimizing the feedstock powder characteristics, process parameters and post-treatments of wear-resistant hardmetal coatings [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Most research, however, has related to the coatings sprayed from agglomerated and sintered powders, with the typical particle size ranging from 10 to 50 lm and WC grain size ranging from 0.8 to 3.5 lm [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Optimization of these coatings has resulted in coating microstructures with negligible porosity, high fracture toughness and minimization of secondary carbide phases [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5) [7]. However, Shipway et al have explained, it was possible that surface material loss can be caused predominantly by pullout of tungsten carbide particles and also by subsurface cracking (caused by the presence of the highly decomposed regions within the microstructure) and therefore, higher wear rates can be expected for specimens heat treated in the air [20]. Jahanmer et al have successfully used the wear delamination theory for explaining studying wear of coatings [18].…”
Section: Analysis Of Wear Tracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saha et al have reported that the mechanism of abrasive wear of the coatings is by micro-cutting and plastic deformation and not by brittle fracture [19]. Shipway et al have reported that for the carbide-based cermet coatings during sliding wear test, surface material removal can be initiated by carbide particle pullout and can be continued by subsurface cracking which can result in higher wear rates [20]. Stocia et al have reported that heat treatment of thermal spray cermet coatings can increase their wear resistance as a result of elimination of the W 2 C phase and improvement of metallurgical bonding at the interface between the constituent lamellae of the coating [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%