1982
DOI: 10.1080/00140138208924935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep loss, recovery sleep, and military performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
2
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
56
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the exact benefits of recovery sleep of various lengths are not fully known, and existing studies do not provide consistent results. Both Babkoff et al (1988) and Haslam (1982) reported that 4 h of sleep lead to partial recovery of performance after 73 and 90 h of TSD, respectively. On the other hand, Ryman et al (1985) reported that 3 h of sleep after only 17 h of continuous work did not improve performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact benefits of recovery sleep of various lengths are not fully known, and existing studies do not provide consistent results. Both Babkoff et al (1988) and Haslam (1982) reported that 4 h of sleep lead to partial recovery of performance after 73 and 90 h of TSD, respectively. On the other hand, Ryman et al (1985) reported that 3 h of sleep after only 17 h of continuous work did not improve performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, although the 4-h nap may have been "restorative," it was not sufficiently restorative to offset the continued deprivation and circadian effects. It should further be noted that the most comparable studies (Haslam, 1982;Naitoh, 1981) did, in fact, report only limited recovery effects from a single period of 3 or 4 h of sleep (as used here) and that Haslam found limited recovery during a low circadian period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Two studies (Akerstadt & Gillberg, 1979;Rosa et al, 1983) that used an awakening-fromsleep design and one (Morgan et al, 1973) that used an immediate-testing design found a significant recovery effect following 4 h of sleep. In a field study, after 3 days of sleep loss, Haslam (1982) found recovery effects resulting from 4 h of sleep per night, and Naitoh et al (1982) EXTENDED PERFORMANCE 35 reported significant recovery effects on one test (but not on others) from 3-h naps. Primary differences in our design from those of the others were the interjection of the 4-h nap well before (24 h) the period of testing, and the test period was conducted during a circadian low period (0000-0600 h) which extended the period of deprivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much of the literature supporting a decrease in physical skill and ability cited by the ACGME in the initiation of DHR was based on studies conducted in nonsurgeons (military personnel and college-aged volunteers) in the self-promoted sleep science literature. 2,9,15,31,43 Two studies of note tested the hypothesis of surgical technical errors occurring due to fatigue. This includes 1 study published prior to the DHR, which demonstrated only marginal reductions in surgical skills following a 24-hour call period in general surgery residents.…”
Section: Technique/trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%